- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is this trade veto worthy or fair?
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:04 pm
Top 2 teams in league, 0.5 pt PPR. Rosters below.
Team A: recieves Jarvis Landry and Alex Collins
Qb: Brees, Winston
Rb: Barkley, White (thats all the Rbs he has)
Wr: Michael Thomas, AJ Green, Crabtree, Shephard, Gabriel, Beasley
TE: Kelce
D/ST: Pitt & LAC
Team B: receives AJ Green
QB: Ryan, Wentz
Rb: Gurley, Cohen, Drake, Mack, Breida, Collins
Wr: Juju, Adams, Landry
Te: Gronk
D/ST: Texans
Team A: recieves Jarvis Landry and Alex Collins
Qb: Brees, Winston
Rb: Barkley, White (thats all the Rbs he has)
Wr: Michael Thomas, AJ Green, Crabtree, Shephard, Gabriel, Beasley
TE: Kelce
D/ST: Pitt & LAC
Team B: receives AJ Green
QB: Ryan, Wentz
Rb: Gurley, Cohen, Drake, Mack, Breida, Collins
Wr: Juju, Adams, Landry
Te: Gronk
D/ST: Texans
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:08 pm to Nonetheless
quote:LM went on a power trip and vetoed it shortly after it was accepted. Didn't even leave it up to the rest of the league.
As fair as it gets
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:09 pm to dafif5
Why veto a trade just because someone made a bad one?
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:14 pm to dafif5
CBS has it as 37-25 with the advantage to the AJ Green side. It's closer than that IMO. Certainly not veto worthy, not even close.
Fantasy pros is 59-41.
Fantasy pros is 59-41.
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:17 pm to TigerLunatik
He could get more for green, but it's no where near Veto level
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:18 pm to dafif5
That's dumb. It shouldn't have been veto'd.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:25 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
Veto level
What is this
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:31 pm to dafif5
quote:
LM went on a power trip and vetoed it shortly after it was accepted. Didn't even leave it up to the rest of the league.
ridiculous, might want to find a more competent league.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:38 pm to CBandits82
quote:will be next year. My team (getting Green, or was supposed to be getting Green) should at the very least be getting my buy in back.
ridiculous, might want to find a more competent league.
Posted on 10/25/18 at 10:43 pm to dafif5
We get alot of threads like this every year. Everytime I see one I think, "man there are a lot of idiots in this world".
I see why he vetoed this trade. Team B is about to have Gurley, Adams, Juju and now Green. That's a pretty stud lineup. He's vetoing a trade because Team B is getting really good, and he doesn't like it.
Your commissioner is a cheater for vetoing this. Reference him here. He's a cheater and a POS
I see why he vetoed this trade. Team B is about to have Gurley, Adams, Juju and now Green. That's a pretty stud lineup. He's vetoing a trade because Team B is getting really good, and he doesn't like it.
Your commissioner is a cheater for vetoing this. Reference him here. He's a cheater and a POS
Posted on 10/25/18 at 11:08 pm to dafif5
No clue how that would even be thought of a possibility of not fair
ETA: Your commish shouldn't be playing fantasy sports and I'd be finding a new league if I were you. That is some pussy shite
ETA: Your commish shouldn't be playing fantasy sports and I'd be finding a new league if I were you. That is some pussy shite
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 10/25/18 at 11:19 pm to Athletix
That's a fair trade. The side getting giving Green up may not be getting quite as much value as he should be but it's tough to get completely fair value for your studs. Definitely not veto level
My RBs were looking sickly so I traded Green, Big Ben, and Burton this week for Chubb, Baldwin, and Russell Wilson. The QBs don't really matter to me as I like Winston's fantasy output over either and it's a one QB league, and giving up Burton isn't a huge deal because I have Ertz (will have to stream Week 9, but Rudolph is on the waiver wire right now), so I viewed this trade pretty much being Green for Chubb and Baldwin, which, isn't great, but you have to make sacrifices sometimes. I needed the RB
My RBs were looking sickly so I traded Green, Big Ben, and Burton this week for Chubb, Baldwin, and Russell Wilson. The QBs don't really matter to me as I like Winston's fantasy output over either and it's a one QB league, and giving up Burton isn't a huge deal because I have Ertz (will have to stream Week 9, but Rudolph is on the waiver wire right now), so I viewed this trade pretty much being Green for Chubb and Baldwin, which, isn't great, but you have to make sacrifices sometimes. I needed the RB
Posted on 10/25/18 at 11:38 pm to dafif5
I’m commish of one of my league’s and I have the final say on all trades (no voting). If a trade is made that I feel is a little lopsided, I simply ask each person how the trade makes their team better. If they can give me a reason that halfway makes sense I approve the trade. I don’t necessarily always agree with it but if they can make an argument then the trade is approved.
This post was edited on 10/25/18 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 10/26/18 at 6:31 am to geauxscott
quote:
I simply ask each person how the trade makes their team better. If they can give me a reason that halfway makes sense I approve the trade.
Posted on 10/26/18 at 8:33 am to Athletix
Similar BS in my 14-team PPR league.
I've been in first place all season and tried trading with the last place team (don't know the guy personally.) He was already really week at RB and lost Freeman to IR. Our league hoards RBs so he's reduced to picking up/playing Wayne Gallman at RB2. WAYNE GALLMAN! So I offer him a trade. I never give my best offer first so I offer him George Kittle and Raheem Mostert for Zack Ertz. He accepts. People bitch that it's not fair. Commish vetoes. No explanation but as you said:
Basically I'm not allowed to better my team because I'm in 1st and am being punished for having a good draft. Whatever. BUT, he lets this trade slide:
Nick Chubb for Willie Snead straight up. One team getting a RB2 and the other getting a bye week fill-in WR that's no better than any other WR on his roster.
Am I missing something because that trade seems far more lopsided than mine? At least I was offering a player of value in the mix.
I've been in first place all season and tried trading with the last place team (don't know the guy personally.) He was already really week at RB and lost Freeman to IR. Our league hoards RBs so he's reduced to picking up/playing Wayne Gallman at RB2. WAYNE GALLMAN! So I offer him a trade. I never give my best offer first so I offer him George Kittle and Raheem Mostert for Zack Ertz. He accepts. People bitch that it's not fair. Commish vetoes. No explanation but as you said:
quote:
That's a pretty stud lineup. He's vetoing a trade because Team B is getting really good, and he doesn't like it.
Basically I'm not allowed to better my team because I'm in 1st and am being punished for having a good draft. Whatever. BUT, he lets this trade slide:
Nick Chubb for Willie Snead straight up. One team getting a RB2 and the other getting a bye week fill-in WR that's no better than any other WR on his roster.
Am I missing something because that trade seems far more lopsided than mine? At least I was offering a player of value in the mix.
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 8:53 am
Posted on 10/26/18 at 8:47 am to Thias2685
Sucks to play in a league with a joke for a commissioner.
Popular
Back to top

9










