- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I vetoed this trade, am i in the wrong?
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:49 am
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:49 am
Team one sends
AB
Austin Ekeler
TB12
Team 2 sends
Nick Chubb
Keenan Allen
Team 2 is undefeated, team 1 is basically eliminated from playoffs.
AB
Austin Ekeler
TB12
Team 2 sends
Nick Chubb
Keenan Allen
Team 2 is undefeated, team 1 is basically eliminated from playoffs.
This post was edited on 11/21/18 at 9:51 am
17
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:52 am to RJL2
Yea you’re wrong. I’d have to see starting lineups to be sure, but I think Team 1 comes out ahead here by a good bit
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:55 am to RJL2
If there is no collusion, no one should care. That's how all veto questions should be approached.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:56 am to RJL2
Dont see the issue.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:56 am to RJL2
Wrong.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 9:56 am to RJL2
Team 2 basically gave up 2 starters for 1. Brady and ekeler aren’t worth much.
Team 1 won the trade IMO
Team 1 won the trade IMO
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:01 am to RJL2
Which team is supposed to be getting the lopsided deal here? Lol
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:02 am to RJL2
Idiot
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:02 am to RJL2
1) this trade is fine, you're part of the problem
2) Can we stop doing this:
2) Can we stop doing this:
quote:That's not a nickname.
TB12
This post was edited on 11/21/18 at 10:03 am
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:04 am to RJL2
Basically eliminated or eliminated?
The only way that shouldn’t go thru is if that team has no shot for the playoffs.
The only way that shouldn’t go thru is if that team has no shot for the playoffs.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:07 am to dj30
I guess my main issue is they're doing it 2 hours before the trade deadline and one of the team's cannot make the playoffs, it seems like collusion to me. Team 2 has no QB
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:07 am to RJL2
You’re wrong and kind of a bitch
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:07 am to Gtothemoney
wow. You got it right for once. 
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:08 am to RJL2
Is it basically eliminated or actually eliminated? Because there's a big difference. If he's actually eliminated then he shouldn't be trading, unless keeper type format. If he still has a shot then that's fair game.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:11 am to Peazey
Eliminated completely now that I looked again, he doesn't hold any tie breakers.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:13 am to GOON
Ok I took back my veto.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:14 am to RJL2
Has no QB, yet is undefeated.. Post the lineups. I gotta see what his team looks like to believe this.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:16 am to RJL2
This is pretty much AB for Allen and Chubb. So ROS WR1 and high end RB2. That's not crazy whatsoever.
Now obviously if he's out of contention, he shouldn't be trading.
I'm guessing he's also getting Ekeler as a Gordon handcuff as part of the deal.
Now obviously if he's out of contention, he shouldn't be trading.
I'm guessing he's also getting Ekeler as a Gordon handcuff as part of the deal.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:18 am to RJL2
quote:
one of the team's cannot make the playoffs, it seems like collusion to me.
The trade is even imo, but if the team is eliminated, he shouldnt be trading.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:25 am to RJL2
quote:
am i in the wrong?
Being butthurt over a trade is not grounds for veto
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News