Started By
Message

Dynasty-trading away Gibbs? UPDATE

Posted on 2/8/25 at 6:40 pm
Posted by Yesca11
Minneapolis
Member since Aug 2008
1942 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 6:40 pm
10 team standard, 1 QB league. I would get BTJ and the 1.06 this year for Gibbs. I already have the 1.07. It could decimate my already thin RB room though. The rest of my team:

QB: Daniels, Penix
RB: Gibbs, Rachaad White, Dobbins, Benson, Edwards, Hunt
WR: Nico, DeVonta Smith, Ridley, Marv, McMillian, Thielen, Downs, Dell, Pearsall
TE: McBride, Noah Gray, Sinnot

Too risky?

This post was edited on 3/3/25 at 2:32 pm
Posted by bbeck
Member since Dec 2011
15072 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 7:24 pm to
Don’t do this

Your RB room would be in shambles

Just take best RB available and pair with Gibbs for the next few years
Posted by Yesca11
Minneapolis
Member since Aug 2008
1942 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 7:37 pm to
That where I’m leaning. Such a deep RB class. If it came down to it,
would you take one of the Ohio St RBs or Kaleb Johnson if they were at 1.07?
Posted by bbeck
Member since Dec 2011
15072 posts
Posted on 2/9/25 at 7:38 am to
Need to wait on landing spots

I personally like Kaleb over the two right now
Posted by LSUbub12
South Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
271 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:18 am to
That’s a terrible return for Gibbs.
I think in dynasty you should always be open to trades but you’d need an epic haul for Gibbs.
Posted by Yesca11
Minneapolis
Member since Aug 2008
1942 posts
Posted on 2/20/25 at 7:46 pm to
UPDATE

Also got offered Lamb, James Conner, and 2025 2.01 for Gibbs. I already have Benson.

Also was offered Chase Brown and 3.01 for Marvin Harrison. It feels uneasy giving up Marv and Gibbs for this, but in the end it would be:

Gibbs and Marv for Lamb, Conner, Brown, 2.01 and 3.01. I would have a near-elite WR corps and a steady RB corp with a new one coming at the 1.07 this year. Stupid for considering this?
This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 6:14 pm
Posted by bbeck
Member since Dec 2011
15072 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Also got offered Lamb, James Conner, and 2025 2.01 for Gibbs.

I’m doing this one

Turn around and potentially trade that 2.01 for a 26 1st or draft a RB here
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 1:33 pm
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68743 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 12:51 pm to
I’d rather the BTJ offer to Lamb. But I think I’d keep Gibbs.

Younger. Arguably as talented/close enough in production and you get a better pick with it.

quote:

Also was offered Chase Brown and 3.01 for Marvin Harrison. It feels uneasy giving up Marv and Gibbs for this, but in the end it would be:


What if you pushed for more draft capital with BTJ AND the brown deal.

This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 12:56 pm
Posted by tigers32
Member since Mar 2012
5746 posts
Posted on 3/3/25 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Also was offered Chase Brown and 3.01 for Marvin Harrison.

Do not do this deal.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
5153 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:53 am to
Gibbs could be a decent fantasy asset for a long time even after he is done competing for overall RB1 because he is so good in the pass game. He is a player I'm likely holding for a long, long time.
Posted by Buddy the Tiger
Member since Nov 2018
132 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:27 am to
Why are you trying to trade Gibbs?? Did I miss a report??
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
15948 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 11:24 am to
I'd stay put with Gibbs and Marv. That's a great young nucleus for the foreseeable future.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram