- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2019 NFL - News, Notes and Stats
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:55 am to Upperdecker
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:55 am to Upperdecker
quote:
He’s due for positive regression on that end.
Such an over used “expert” term in the Twitterverse
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:31 pm to BilJ
Has anyone made a move for Barkley?
I'm having a hard time valuing him right now. Guy in my league is 0-3 AND was riding the Ekeler wave. I was thinking about sending Fournette/J Jackson(was going to drop after this week) for his Ekeler/Barkley.
HPPR & I'm 3-0. I'd still have Ingram/Breida/Ekeler(after trade)/mattison/Brown to try and get me to Barkley's return. At THAT point, i'd be tough to beat with Watson/ingram/barkley/julio/AJ/TY & Kelce.
I'm having a hard time valuing him right now. Guy in my league is 0-3 AND was riding the Ekeler wave. I was thinking about sending Fournette/J Jackson(was going to drop after this week) for his Ekeler/Barkley.
HPPR & I'm 3-0. I'd still have Ingram/Breida/Ekeler(after trade)/mattison/Brown to try and get me to Barkley's return. At THAT point, i'd be tough to beat with Watson/ingram/barkley/julio/AJ/TY & Kelce.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:39 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
Explain why he would do that trade...
Is Fournette an upgrade over Ekeler even with Gordon playing? Why would anyone want Justin Jackson for any reason?
Is Fournette an upgrade over Ekeler even with Gordon playing? Why would anyone want Justin Jackson for any reason?
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:41 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
if Barkley is on the long end of that estimate, you're looking at not having him until week one of the playoffs. So yeah it'd be nice to have him for that stretch but I'd still wait a few more weeks and be more secure about my playoff spot before making that move
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:43 pm to MrWiseGuy
I think he and Flacco get it fixed this week. No Jalen Ramsey, and this is only their second game in Denver this year (first was against Bears). They’ve also played 2 very good defenses in 3 weeks of play so far
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:46 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
You can send it.
No one would accept that trade though
No one would accept that trade though
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:46 pm to BilJ
quote:
Positive regression
quote:
Such an over used “expert” term in the Twitterverse
A lot of stupid people over use it in some bad cases when they don’t really understand it. This case it actually applies IMO
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:48 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
I think you’re gonna hurt yourself with that lineup. Ekeler and Breida are about to lose some touches for sure. You’re gonna be scraping for RB points waiting for Barkley, and there’s no guarantee he comes back this year since Giants won’t compete for anything
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:57 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
Explain why he would do that trade...
Is Fournette an upgrade over Ekeler even with Gordon playing? Why would anyone want Justin Jackson for any reason?
I understand what you're saying and that's part of the reason I'm asking as far as value goes.
Fournette gets 95% of the touches in Jax, with MG back Ekeler will fall. Fournette hasn't played well but touches are king and you figure (i do, at least) that this a slump for him and not an indicator for the rest of the season.
Jackson would've been a throw in since I'd drop him after this week anyway. Dude's 0-3 and needs wins now. Jackson is in my flex this weekend and would be in his flex as well.
You guys are right. If it takes that much explanation I'm over valuing my own guys. I'll ride with what I've got. Appreciate it.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 12:57 pm to Upperdecker
if its a situation like Julio where he's a talented WR in a potent offense, there's just some bad luck in connecting down there yeah eventually that's going to correct itself.
When you've got Flacco throwing to you, inefficiency is expected
When you've got Flacco throwing to you, inefficiency is expected
Posted on 9/26/19 at 1:00 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
I'd do a Fournette for Barkley straight up swap if I were an 0-3 barkley owner...wouldn't throw in Ekeler though
Posted on 9/26/19 at 1:00 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
Is Fournette an upgrade over Ekeler even with Gordon playing?
Yes
Posted on 9/26/19 at 1:03 pm to BilJ
I disagree on that. The Julio thing was the exact opposite of positive regression. It’s unlikely that a QB and WR are going to continually disconnect on red zone TD passes, or that a WR leading his team in air yards won’t score a TD (Sutton). The Julio thing Matt Ryan wasn’t even looking at him. The Falcons were using him as a distraction to draw double coverage in the end zone to free up everyone else. Julio wasn’t getting any red zone targets. That was a scheme issue, not just a statistical outlier, which is what regression is based off. It ended up being that every team figured out what the Falcons were doing with Julio and started fading coverage away from him, so Matt Ryan had to start going back to him in the endzone
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 1:10 pm to dj30
quote:
Yes
Agree, but not so much that someone might throw in Barkley.
But also
Posted on 9/26/19 at 2:56 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
Damien Williams will again not practice for the Chiefs today. Looking like a second straight week off for him.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:35 pm to TigerLunatik
Damn. I legitimately thought he just tweaked it, not a multiple week injury. Mccoy will put up stupid numbers if he can stay healthy
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:35 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
I have also been expecting more from Fournette this year, although just found a few reasons to be more positive about him going forward.
First is his lack of TDs, which I think will change simply because of his usage and also being their best option in short yardage.
Next is his increased involvement in the passing game. If you take his yards from scrimmage this year and assume he continues that through 16 games (big if for injuries of course), then he ends up with 1,456 yards. That would have put him as the 6th best RB last year.
Minshew appears to be a much better fit than they've had at QB in the past, which should start to ease the box a little.
First is his lack of TDs, which I think will change simply because of his usage and also being their best option in short yardage.
Next is his increased involvement in the passing game. If you take his yards from scrimmage this year and assume he continues that through 16 games (big if for injuries of course), then he ends up with 1,456 yards. That would have put him as the 6th best RB last year.
Minshew appears to be a much better fit than they've had at QB in the past, which should start to ease the box a little.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:55 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
Williams supposedly just has a knee contusion. Being out 2 weekw seems like more than just a contusion to me, but I'm not doctor.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:18 pm to lsuhunt555
I would play Sutton over Brown in PPR
Posted on 9/27/19 at 9:49 am to Upperdecker
Godwin practicing today.
Devin Singletary also practicing.
Devin Singletary also practicing.
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 10:23 am
Popular
Back to top


2






