re: Should able boddied people on welfare be force to work?

How is it cost prohibitive? Getting tested at a clinic only costs like $50. You know what money they use to buy those drugs, right? That's your money

quote:

---

Not everyone is a worker by nature

---

frick them.

We are going to need people to help build a wall.

quote:

---

I am actually against that. The cost is prohibitive and drug testing is unfairly skewed towards pot.

---

So they can afford to do drugs but still need welfare?

They should be required to do 40hrs of community service every week. Our taxes would go down and our communities would be clean and maintained.

What really pisses me off is a kid came in our store wanting to buy a gun. I aws filling out a credit check and I asked him his income, he got $790 a month for being fully disabled. I couldn't believe that someone in his condition received so little help while millions get $1000s of dollars every month and have nothing wrong with them.

These requirements already exist. They need to be better enforced.

I've always said there shouldn't be a single piece of trash on the streets or highways and the grass should always be cut in public places just simply by virtue of making those receiving handouts do something.

Most of us know nothing is free. If you're able-bodied, get off your a$$.

But everyone is an eater by nature. I bet you'd be surprised by the results when you tie working directly to eating. A bunch of people would probably figure out how to be "in the right place at the right time on any consistent basis" if doing so became the conditions for their survival.

And drug tested to live in govt subsidized housing