Started By
Message

re: JJ Redick donation

Posted on 9/3/21 at 3:40 pm to
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17868 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Hes criticizing how someone in her position is distributing her recourses to those less powerful and with less status than her.



Using your expansive definition of "political" makes any discussion of a rich person giving a donation to the less fortunate "political."

That would make your comment meaningless.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110896 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

You not understanding the difference between "not falling over to congratulate" and "openly criticizing and scoffing" is kind of the whole argument here though. And it proves my original point.


Point to one place where i "fell over congratulating" or even "congratulated in the slightest".
Generally, when once has to exaggerated to make their point, they either know or subconsciously know they have a weak point to make, hence trying to bolster it with the exaggeration.
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
11510 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 3:50 pm to
I think she should have donated more as a smart business decision and pr move, but don’t consider the context when y’all downvote away.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22439 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Using your expansive definition of "political" makes any discussion of a rich person giving a donation to the less fortunate "political."


It’s not my definition.

Also the act isn’t political per say. The DISCUSSION is political

Just because your definiton of political is overly myopic means nothing.
This post was edited on 9/3/21 at 4:05 pm
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22439 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

attempt to defend Gayle’s hono


I have yet to.

I’m attacking the critique. There’s a difference.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

I think she should have donated more as a smart business decision and pr move, but don’t consider the context when y’all downvote away.


To be fair, the statement they released said the million dollars was an “initial donation” and that they will continue to be in “contact with government leaders and aid providers to determine where aid can be most effective.”

So there is the door being left open for additional donations.

But I do agree that it’s a pretty weak initial offering given her position and the context she exists in.
This post was edited on 9/3/21 at 4:17 pm
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

I have yet to.

I’m attacking the critique. There’s a difference.


You went after a poster on a personal level because he made negative comments toward Benson you didn’t like….It’s exactly what you are doing.

Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22439 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

You went after a poster on a personal level because he made negative comments toward Benson you didn’t like….It’s exactly what you are doing.


I pointed out that Lester does this exact thing every time. Cause he does.

You are mad that someone is going after LESTER EARL lololol


Come on dude
This post was edited on 9/3/21 at 7:03 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278480 posts
Posted on 9/3/21 at 7:44 pm to
You do the same thing every time
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram