- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Line Item Veto
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:02 pm
Would've been great today. Cut the fat and sign a clean bill.
10
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:04 pm to Dawgwithnoname
Yup
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:06 pm to Dawgwithnoname
Would you be ok with a Democrat president having that same power?
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:08 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Would you be ok with a Democrat president having that same power?
Yes.
*I think it would be a way for the American people to finally see where any proposed policies go...the quality of their lives and economy under socialist policies vs the quality of their lives under conservative policies.*
This post was edited on 3/25/20 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:10 pm to Brosef Stalin
If the Democrat would cut out the Kennedy Center BS etc. Then Yes.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:12 pm to Dawgwithnoname
It was rightfully deemed unconstitutional. We don’t throw out the constitution because it is difficult.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:13 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Would you be ok with a Democrat president having that same power?
If it's cutting fat. Yes.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:16 pm to Dawgwithnoname
read your history..
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:23 pm to Dawgwithnoname
Unnecessary if Trump would have stated from jump that anything other than a one line clean bill would be vetoed with extreme prejudice. And That all those obstaining from voting on any bill will be identified in every weekly press conference along with those votes on record.
Pulling back the curtain on every issue is the only way those cocksukkers will learn
Pulling back the curtain on every issue is the only way those cocksukkers will learn
Posted on 3/25/20 at 8:27 pm to Dawgwithnoname
Trump loves the bill 
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:09 pm to Redleg Guy
quote:
It was rightfully deemed unconstitutional. We don’t throw out the constitution because it is difficult.
The issue is not a new one. The constitution of the Confederacy specifically allowed line item vetoes.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:11 pm to MISSOURI WALTZ
If all of these states and municipalities continue to make authoritarian overreach with "emergency powers", then hell yes Trump should attempt a challenge to the unconstitutionality of Line Item veto
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:19 pm to DTRooster
You get my vote.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:21 pm to Apollyon
quote:He doesn't want to
If all of these states and municipalities continue to make authoritarian overreach with "emergency powers", then hell yes Trump should attempt a challenge to the unconstitutionality of Line Item veto
Not even a little
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:26 pm to Dawgwithnoname
“Line item veto” is one of the most anti-Constitutional, authoritarian, moronic proposals ever floated.
EVERY piece of legislation is the end-result of negotiation ... legislative give-and-take amongst 535 folks elected by everyone in this country The very essence of our representative democracy.
And every few years we get some group of idiots with a mancrush on the then-current occupant of the Oval Office, proposing that ONE PERSON with 51% support have the power to undue that delicate balance.
EVERY piece of legislation is the end-result of negotiation ... legislative give-and-take amongst 535 folks elected by everyone in this country The very essence of our representative democracy.
And every few years we get some group of idiots with a mancrush on the then-current occupant of the Oval Office, proposing that ONE PERSON with 51% support have the power to undue that delicate balance.
This post was edited on 3/25/20 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:32 pm to Dawgwithnoname
In general I support the idea of making it a Constitutional Amendment, but what stops a President from allowing spending/allocations but vetoing revenue generation.
I would prefer ending the omnibus monstrosities where both sides of Congress serve up a shite sandwich that America has to eat.
1 bill
1 function
1 clear title that relates to it
If they want to fund 18,000 different programs, make their asses vote on every damn one of them while in session.
I would prefer ending the omnibus monstrosities where both sides of Congress serve up a shite sandwich that America has to eat.
1 bill
1 function
1 clear title that relates to it
If they want to fund 18,000 different programs, make their asses vote on every damn one of them while in session.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 9:40 pm to Redleg Guy
quote:Time to amend the constitution.
It was rightfully deemed unconstitutional.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 10:09 pm to Dawgwithnoname
One bill one law/regulation/order.
A thousand plus pages for a stimulus bill is ridiculous. I assume the hope is folks stop reading part of the way through and say F it.
A thousand plus pages for a stimulus bill is ridiculous. I assume the hope is folks stop reading part of the way through and say F it.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 11:13 pm to Dawgwithnoname
this is a voter issue not a POTUS powers issue
those who voted these dimrat idiots in power are retarded
but those who voted in these rinos that are all too happy to spend an extra trillion on dimrat BS need to be gone, i hate them more then dimrats because at least dimrats are honest about being liberal democrats
those who voted these dimrat idiots in power are retarded
but those who voted in these rinos that are all too happy to spend an extra trillion on dimrat BS need to be gone, i hate them more then dimrats because at least dimrats are honest about being liberal democrats
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News