Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

After watching highlights

Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:16 pm
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:16 pm
I'd take Ingram, Kuzma, and a 4th to draft Garland and small ball it, could be lethal. Ball can stay in LA. Can't stand that family.
Posted by CoeJ
Member since Oct 2010
1827 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:17 pm to
If you watch highlights to form an opinion, I don't want it.
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:17 pm to
Enlighten me.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52530 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:18 pm to
Watch the lowlights and come back to us
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71505 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:18 pm to
Alex Caruso has a sick 35 second highlight on YT. AD for him straight up
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:20 pm to
Dude, you are so right. Throw Caruso in the trade too.
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:22 pm to
Y'all care to tell me why this would be a bad trade instead of acting like highschool brat fricks?
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32624 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:23 pm to
Yeah good call. Let’s grab a bunch of dudes who couldn’t win with fricking lebron.
Posted by CoeJ
Member since Oct 2010
1827 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:23 pm to
Nah.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52530 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:24 pm to
Because you’re basing your opinions off of highlights. The whole point of highlights is to make the player look good. You could make Frank Jackson look like a future all star with highlights. You’re an idiot
Posted by scutfarcus
Member since Jun 2016
353 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:24 pm to
Nah that’s poo. Also garland is represented by Paul too. Rather not have any body associated with that piece of shite on our roster.
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:28 pm to
You have a point there.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
29982 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Ball can stay in LA.


I wouldn't mind Ball if the lakers keep his dad.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:42 pm to
Mike Schmitz that you bro?
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't mind Ball if the lakers keep his dad.

True.

Here's the thing, beyond highlights. If the Lakers give up Ball, Kuzma, Ingram, and a 4th, Pelicans would be getting two former 2nd overall picks and an NBA All Rookie first team selection in Kuzma, who are all young and have upside, for ONE PLAYER. Pick up another young and upcoming with the 4th and that sets up a very good team for future years to come who could all grow together.

So what if AD wants to go there. Is that why people don't want the trade, because somehow they got their feelings hurt? It's a business. If pelicans new management are entertaining this potential trade, obviously they must see some good in it, and they know a hell of a lot more than anyone posting on this message board does.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18962 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

After watching highlights I'd take Ingram, Kuzma, and a 4th to draft Garland


After watching porn, I bet you think you are an expert at long dicking too, right?
Posted by Friedbrie
Abita Springs
Member since Jun 2018
1519 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

After watching porn, I bet you think you are an expert at long dicking too, right?



Basketball expert, no. Long dicking expert, yes.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:09 pm to
I don't really care where they were picked or what meaningless awards they won.

I care about what they've done on the court and the Lakers have the most questions between the 2 packages and don't have anything like the Memphis pick or a future asset.

Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18962 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Basketball expert, no. Long dicking expert, yes.


Posted by Pendulum
Member since Jan 2009
7042 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Here's the thing, beyond highlights. If the Lakers give up Ball, Kuzma, Ingram, and a 4th, Pelicans would be getting two former 2nd overall picks and an NBA All Rookie first team selection in Kuzma, who are all young and have upside, for ONE PLAYER. Pick up another young and upcoming with the 4th and that sets up a very good team for future years to come who could all grow together.


Here's the thing, the first descriptor you used, is a meaningless "formally picked at" stat. That's alarming.

The sum of the parts do not equal the whole in the NBA, you can't look at it like omgosh I'm getting 3 guys for 1. You can only put 5 guys on the floor at a time. That team you end up with has massive holes, they would still need to make moves.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram