- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Best NFL Receiving Corps?
Posted on 11/5/12 at 5:43 am to LSUTil_iDie
Posted on 11/5/12 at 5:43 am to LSUTil_iDie
Wallace, Brown, and Miller is at least a top 5 core
1
Posted on 11/5/12 at 6:32 am to KillerNut9
I think the Packers are the best when healthy because they are so deep. The Falcons and Giants are definitely the next two.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 8:28 am to LSUTil_iDie
Steelers - Wallace, Brown, Sanders, H. Miller
Not a contestant?
Not a contestant?
Posted on 11/5/12 at 8:33 am to NOTORlOUSD
I think the Falcons have the best WR1,WR2,TE1 combo. I would give the edge to the Packers if we are including depth tho
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 8:34 am
Posted on 11/5/12 at 8:33 am to LSUgators
And Cotchery, Rainey, Sanders...
Bunch of idiots up in here if you dont think the steelers dont have a top 5 core..
Bunch of idiots up in here if you dont think the steelers dont have a top 5 core..
Posted on 11/5/12 at 8:34 am to GreatLakesTiger24
I like Nate, but...
Broyles > Burleson
I said it when he went down, that injury was a blessing in disguise.
Broyles > Burleson
I said it when he went down, that injury was a blessing in disguise.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:48 am to LSUTil_iDie
Probably the Falcons. Steelers are also sick.
Btw, Branch is not even close to being a main option for the Patriots.
If you go 4 deep, its pretty hard to beat the Pats.
Lloyd, Gronk, A-Hern, Welker.
Btw, Branch is not even close to being a main option for the Patriots.
If you go 4 deep, its pretty hard to beat the Pats.
Lloyd, Gronk, A-Hern, Welker.
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 11:49 am
Posted on 11/5/12 at 12:44 pm to Jcorye1
If the Cowboys could ever just get it to-freaking-gether, they would have by far the best with Austin, Bryant, and Witten.
Ogletree isn't bad either.
Ogletree isn't bad either.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 1:44 pm to LSUTil_iDie
Giants, Falcons, Packers (when healthy) are the top receiving corps IMO.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 1:45 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
If the Cowboys could ever just get it to-freaking-gether, they would have by far the best with Austin, Bryant, and Witten.
Ogletree isn't bad either.
Idk about "by far" but they would be good, probably still not better than Falcons, Packers or Giants IMO.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 2:05 pm to LooseCannon22282
No shite if you lose your top two receivers what team wouldn't be in trouble?
Posted on 11/5/12 at 3:25 pm to maringer11
quote:
No shite if you lose your top two receivers what team wouldn't be in trouble?
I was just pointing out that with Jennings and Nelson hurt, Green Bay has still been pretty good on offense. Credit Randall Cobb and James Jones for making the most of their opportunities. What the hell did you think I meant?
Green Bay has the best depth at WR in my opinion. If White and Julio were both injured do you think ATL could tread water like Green Bay has? Don't be an idiot.
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 11/18/12 at 7:44 pm to LSUTil_iDie
Bump
Anyone want to add saints to their list?
Lance, Colston, & Graham are all playing beastmode right now
Anyone want to add saints to their list?
Lance, Colston, & Graham are all playing beastmode right now
Posted on 11/18/12 at 8:13 pm to maringer11
quote:
No shite if you lose your top two receivers what team wouldn't be in trouble?
Packers
Saints
That's it.
Posted on 11/18/12 at 8:18 pm to St Augustine
When healthy Patriots and Packers are a clear top 2.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News