- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are online idea platforms if they aren’t “for free speech”?
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:02 am to Decatur
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:02 am to Decatur
quote:Because you agree with the underlying goals, which consist of the erasure/banning of wrongthink and the suppression of alternate media outlets.
This guy’s comments about Twitter’s recommendation system seem pretty innocuous though
Let’s not beat around the bush here.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:03 am to Decatur
quote:Therefore, let’s just do away with the idea of free and open discourse.
I mean yeah we don’t live in the AOL Nineties any more.
You progressives are truly regressive.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:08 am to Scruffy
quote:
Because you agree with the underlying goals, which consist of the erasure/banning of wrongthink and the suppression of alternate media outlets.
If Twitter is putting recommended tweets on my timeline I don’t want to see the Qanon stuff. It’s usually just comedians making jokes though. Honestly I really could do without the recommended tweets feature.
In terms of getting banned for “wrongthink” though this forum is much worse than Twitter. I’ve been suspended a couple of times for things that certainly did not violate this site’s published rules.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:10 am to Decatur
quote:
If Twitter is putting recommended tweets on my timeline I don’t want to see the Qanon stuff.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
But you nutted for every Muh Russian lie that was tweeted.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:13 am to Decatur
quote:Yea, because that is the sole goal here.
If Twitter is putting recommended tweets on my timeline I don’t want to see the Qanon stuff. It’s usually just comedians making jokes though. Honestly I really could do without the recommended tweets feature.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://i.imgur.com/wAMVymH.gif)
Why are you regressive so disingenuous about their motives?
It isn’t as if Twitter has been hiding their viewpoints over the previous 4 years.
quote:
In terms of getting banned for “wrongthink” though this forum is much worse than Twitter. I’ve been suspended a couple of times for things that certainly did not violate this site’s published rules.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Twitter banned the sitting president.
And this board is about as akin to Twitter as Democratic Underground is.
Twitter became THE public square over its previous 4 years.
Talk about delusion.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:15 am to Jbird
quote:And not a single person was banned from Twitter for posting “fake news” regarding the “Muh Russian” lies.
But you nutted for every Muh Russian lie that was tweeted.
Decatur knows this.
He is just doing his best to gaslight for his regressive party.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:16 am to Scruffy
quote:
Twitter banned the sitting president.
He incited a riot. Good riddance.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:17 am to Decatur
quote:
He incited a riot. Good riddance.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:19 am to Decatur
quote:I also love how you regressives pick one sentence out of an entire post to respond to.
Decatur
It just goes to show your inability to put forth anything akin to a decent argument or discussion.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:19 am to IslandBuckeye
Decatur is a 5’6 dweeb that gets off on his former tormentors being subject to liberal policies
He has a bad case of stuffed in locker syndrome
He has a bad case of stuffed in locker syndrome
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:19 am to Scruffy
Decatur loves newspeak. Big brother good, big brother just, big brother love
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:22 am to NIH
quote:That is simply oversimplifying the regressive mindset.
Decatur is a 5’6 dweeb that gets off on his former tormentors being subject to liberal policies
He has a bad case of stuffed in locker syndrome
It isn’t so much a “revenge” aspect as it is a “fear” one.
They fear the concept of deciding things for themselves, which is why they have such a drive to live within the “serf”-esque societies of yore.
It is far easier for them to live within a world of “mandates at the barrel of a gun” than anything else.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:22 am to Scruffy
quote:
And not a single person was banned from Twitter for posting “fake news” regarding the “Muh Russian” lies.
I’m not going to try to untangle what you mean by “Muh Russia” (which is typically a key for me to ignore the person who invokes this nonsense phrase).
Btw I got my first suspension here for posting a thread about a Washington Post article. Everything in the article was true.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:22 am to Decatur
quote:
He incited a riot. Good riddance.
Let your voices be peacefully heard. Such violent rhetoric. No wonder he was banned.
Also, this was a speech, not on Twitter. So you're OK with Twitter not only controlling their platform but also what happens offline?
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:25 am to Decatur
quote:
Everything in the article was true.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:25 am to Decatur
quote:That the previous administration colluded with the Russians to win the election, something which won journalists Pulitzer Prizes.
I’m not going to try to untangle what you mean by “Muh Russia” (which is typically a key for me to ignore the person who invokes this nonsense phrase).
Also something which has been thoroughly disproven, up to the point where the NYT and Washington Post have had to place disclaimers on said Pulitzer Prize articles about their factual nature.
God damn, you regressives are so unbelievably disingenuous.
quote:And, as I said, this board is as akin to Twitter as DU is.
Btw I got my first suspension here for posting a thread about a Washington Post article. Everything in the article was true.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:27 am to Jbird
quote:Start referring to Decatur as “Danchenko”.
Sure thing Mr. Steele
Then again, I doubt he even knows who Igor Danchenko is, if he still believes the Russian collusion nonsense.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:30 am to Scruffy
quote:About the same aren't they?
Start referring to Decatur as “Danchenko”.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:35 am to Scruffy
DOJ definitely had cause to investigate whether members of Trump’s campaign were coordinating anything with Russian intelligence. Carter Page was a known Russian intelligence asset and Paul Manafort’s parter was a Russian intelligence officer. Russians hacked a whole bunch of people and used Wikileaks to spread that information in order to help Trump win. I’m glad we investigated and indicted when there was a criminal case to be made.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:37 am to Decatur
Still believes a piss dossier. ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)