Started By
Message
locked post

T or F: Did OJ literally get away with a double murder?

Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:36 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94739 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:36 pm
Because I'm pretty sure he literally got away with a double murder.
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71320 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:37 pm to
From all that was told I believe you to be correct.
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18440 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:38 pm to
That’d be a T.
Posted by markinkaty
Katy Tx
Member since Dec 2019
4507 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:39 pm to
No, Fuhrman and those white supremacist cops literally jumped through a thousand hoops to set him up.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154016 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Did OJ literally get away with a double murder?
Because I'm pretty sure he literally got away with a double murder.
LINK
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
65308 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:41 pm to
Of course he did. Only a complete moron believes otherwise
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84421 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:41 pm to
Yeah, I thought this was like a wink and a nod thing for everyone in society regardless of age, race or socioeconomic status.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

I thought this was like a wink and a nod thing for everyone in society regardless of age, race or socioeconomic status.


Biggest open open secret in history.

And there's not a damn thing that can be done about it.
Posted by SlickRickerz
Member since Oct 2018
2290 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:11 pm to
Yes and no. I think he paid to have them murdered, which yes is terms for a murder charge, but a completely different case for the prosecution. I don’t think he pulled the trigger and he idiotically went to the crime scene to see if the job was done, leaving his DNA. I think the prosecution failed to establish a defined timeline for the jury. I think the jury wanted to convict him and new he was heavily involved somehow, just the prosecution failed to tell them exactly how and what exactly took place.
Posted by Stagliano
Member since Dec 2020
1661 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:12 pm to
Didn't a juror come back and literally say it was payback for Rodney King?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84421 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

I don’t think he pulled the trigger


Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68763 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:14 pm to
Lol no. He went there and killed them. I wish rittenhouse would have had a dream team defending him. Would have been way more entertaining like the OJ trial.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 11:16 pm
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I thought this was like a wink and a nod thing for everyone in society regardless of age, race or socioeconomic status.



What gave you that idea?

Posted by BuzzSaw 12
The Dark Side Of The Moon
Member since Dec 2010
6769 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Because I'm pretty sure he literally got away with a double murder.




Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140708 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

es and no. I think he paid to have them murdered, which yes is terms for a murder charge, but a completely different case for the prosecution. I don’t think he pulled the trigger and he idiotically went to the crime scene to see if the job was done, leaving his DNA. I think the prosecution failed to establish a defined timeline for the jury. I think the jury wanted to convict him and new he was heavily involved somehow, just the prosecution failed to tell them exactly how and what exactly took place.



Posted by markinkaty
Katy Tx
Member since Dec 2019
4507 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:19 pm to
He used a knife: he butchered them.
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Yes and no. I think he paid to have them murdered, which yes is terms for a murder charge, but a completely different case for the prosecution. I don’t think he pulled the trigger and he idiotically went to the crime scene to see if the job was done, leaving his DNA. I think the prosecution failed to establish a defined timeline for the jury. I think the jury wanted to convict him and new he was heavily involved somehow, just the prosecution failed to tell them exactly how and what exactly took place.



Is there something you now that most others don't?
Posted by Geaux Guy
Member since Dec 2018
6568 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:19 pm to
Yes, he absolutely did. ‘If the glove don’t fit, you have to acquit’
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18327 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:21 pm to
OJ exerted his white privilege.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 11:24 pm
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140708 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:23 pm to
Cochran took OJ off the inflammatory meds for the glove thing. He Jedi mind tricked Darden into that one

Clark probably wins the case in NoCal or San Diego. I was shocked they never even tried to change the venue out of LA County
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram