Started By
Message
locked post

Martin Luther king would not agree with the current leftist in this country

Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:22 am
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18160 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:22 am
For those who don’t know a ton about the history of the 60s there was 2 separate black movements at the time. You had the black panthers/black liberation army which was a violent,communist, revolutionary, black supremacist and separatist movement most notably led by Malcolm X. These people murdered 38 policeman over the course of around 2 years. They also committed robberies and many other crimes and saw themselves as allies with communist across the world including the north Vietnamese we were currently at war with. Then there was the peaceful movement of martin Luther king. He believed in non violence and reform instead of revolution. There’s a reason he said he wanted the black children and white children to play together. It seems weird to me now though, that the left has co-oped MLK as someone who they support and who they assume would support them. Now although he had plenty of flaws in his personal life the man was a believer in god and not a believer in communism. He also did not want death to America, that was the other black movement of the 60s that was actually against martin Luther king. So why is it now they wish to use him as a hero of their cause when the leftist of the day looked at him with disdain and considered him weak and an enemy to their cause?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62311 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:23 am to
Who cares?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125051 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:26 am to
I think he would agree with the leftists. He had socialist/Communist sympathies. I think his non-violence was based on pragmatism and he was opportunistic (that’s not meant to sound as pejorative as it does).
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18160 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Who cares?
the left does but I’m trying to understand why? Why do they care about portraying Martin Luther king as their ally or someone that would ally with them? You’d think they would hate him now the same way they hated him then
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62311 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:27 am to
quote:

I think he would agree with the leftists. He had socialist/Communist sympathies. I think his non-violence was based on pragmatism and he was opportunistic (that’s not meant to sound as pejorative as it does).


This is likely correct.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:28 am to
Yeah mlk was a womanizing, cheating Marxist.

I honestly don’t believe anything I’m told about any “mainstream” historical recanting of black historical figures anymore. Why would they all of a sudden start lying now?

In 40 years George Floyd will be considered the current eras MLK.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
10881 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:28 am to
Reagan would be va rino
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18160 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

I think he would agree with the leftists. He had socialist/Communist sympathies. I think his non-violence was based on pragmatism and he was opportunistic (that’s not meant to sound as pejorative as it does)
he had sympathies for people he saw as being mistreated by a corrupt system but from the record it seems his beliefs in god were real, which wouldn’t sit well with communist, and again he didn’t want to see the overthrow of America, the black liberation army and black panthers did. Those are the people that called the Vietcong their brothers in arms. If he’d wanted to side with those people they were around back in the day
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18160 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Yeah mlk was a womanizing, cheating Marxist.
definitely a womanizer but he wasn’t a Marxist that was the other black movement of the time. They actually disliked king because of his religious beliefs and non violent attitude
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125051 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:30 am to
quote:

he had sympathies for people he saw as being mistreated by a corrupt system but from the record it seems his beliefs in god were real, which wouldn’t sit well with communist


I think you’re underplaying his Communist sympathies.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:32 am to
I don’t think a president who told striking unions to go frick themselves and told university chancellors they’re enabling petulant children would be considered a “rino”.

Bill Clinton however would definitely be a racist bigot by today’s leftist standards.
This post was edited on 7/10/21 at 8:33 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125051 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:33 am to
Shut up, idiot.
Posted by JimNat
Member since Jan 2020
901 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:43 am to
Good messsge. I go back and forth with King. Maybe he was a true born again believer with flaws. He did however have Stanley Levinson a true Marxist advising him. Who knows.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:46 am to
His handlers would have turned him into a Al Sharpton type "activist".
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18160 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:54 am to
quote:

His handlers would have turned him into a Al Sharpton type "activist".
could be I just don’t understand why the Marxist of today retcon him as one of their own when at the time he was not
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23887 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 8:56 am to
Believe me, he would’ve “evolved." Of course, evolving would mean millions of more dollars into his pocket.
Posted by IKKAY
Member since Jun 2019
96 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 10:06 am to
Ummm….
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16612 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Bill Clinton however would definitely be a racist bigot by today’s leftist standards.



And pedo joe has MANY documented racist comments. But the media ignores them.
Posted by CrusaderInfidel
Tishomingo
Member since Feb 2015
248 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 10:48 am to
You’re wrong. He preached black rights exclusive of any other minority...and he did not preach the Gospel.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15416 posts
Posted on 7/10/21 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Martin Luther king would not agree with the current leftist in this country


What gives you pause to believe MLK wouldn’t have shifted left like most of the other civil rights leaders?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram