Started By
Message

re: Bret Weinstein now has 2 strikes against him on YouTube

Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:34 pm to
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
18047 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

The point remains that speech should be allowed and properly ridiculed if warranted, but not silenced.

No one is denying his right to say anything. YouTube just doesn't care to host it on their platform.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85136 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

No one is denying his right to say anything. YouTube just doesn't care to host it on their platform.


The places where they make editorial decisions are awfully suspect. The partial censorship shite is BS.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

No one is denying his right to say anything. YouTube just doesn't care to host it on their platform.


He’s making the point that their policy is overly censorious.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

quote:
The point remains that speech should be allowed and properly ridiculed if warranted, but not silenced.

No one is denying his right to say anything. YouTube just doesn't care to host it on their platform.




So they just deny other people's right to hear him then.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
6588 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

No one is denying his right to say anything. YouTube just doesn't care to host it on their platform.


20 years ago I agree with you but not now, if these big tech companies want to control who says what online then it has to go both ways. Anyone that thinks its ok that these tech companies have this much power is IMO a damn fool.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram