Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court asked to review men-only draft registration law

Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:18 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
135225 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:18 am to
quote:

The case is being brought by women's rights groups who argue that the rare men-only rule sends the wrong signal and is discriminatory

This is close to peak bizarro world
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81466 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:20 am to
The ruling that needs to happen is that the Selective Service is ruled unconstitutional.
Posted by HughsWorkPhone
Member since Sep 2017
1162 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Also the thought of these millennial girls having to go through basic training and even worse, no cell phone would be worth the price of admission.


More likely they would change basic than it is basic would change them
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7623 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:27 am to
@TenWheelsForJesus

quote:

On one hand, I think this would help immensely in giving the youth discipline and maybe patriotism. On the other, I don't agree with forcing people to become cannon fodder for the globalist elites. If the military was strictly a defense force, then I would be all for it. But I'm not sending my kid to die in a foreign land so politicians and defense contractors can make even more money while the media and swamp creatures tell him he is evil just for being white and having good values.



@DarthRebel

quote:

I think women should be forced to signup for Selective Service, at the same time Selective Service should be abolished.

The world has changed and there will never be a draft again. Vietnam changed everything where over 50,000 men died for politicians.

The All Volunteer Military was born in the 1970s from that and has provided for a much more valuable asset.

In lieu of the draft though, I do buy into the 1-2 years of military training and conditioning for 18-20 year olds.


I don't disagree with your conclusions but I still feel Conscription outweighs the issues you've mentioned. I would argue that a strong military is the deterrent. The weaker our military posture is the more likely some tin-plated dictator will test our mettle.

This isn't the only generation politicians have used the military to advance an agenda. That the history of mankind. I would argue a healthy generation or two of young people that served and learned more about patriotism, honor and duty would later in life become the leaders this nation needs.

There are many jobs in all branches of the military that are not combat related. Cyber intel is huge and getting bigger. A lot of medical jobs aren't combat related. My point is that not all jobs is combat and has been pointed out, the battlefield is changing.

This post was edited on 6/7/21 at 8:30 am
Posted by George Dickel
Member since Jun 2019
1643 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:29 am to
During the last draft the military lowered its standards.... big time. If another draft is implemented... it will happen again.

“Cannon fodder”.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
31658 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:31 am to
What about the ones that don’t identify as a man or a woman?

Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8492 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Until then, I don't think we should force 18 year olds to sign up for the draft, male or female.


I can assure you it will not be the sons and daughters of the intelligentsia who will provide cannon fodder for globalist at the UN. It will be the sons (and daughters) of the exploited middle class who will come back to us in body bags.

Frick'um. Frick'um all.
This post was edited on 6/7/21 at 8:56 am
Posted by UAinSOUTHAL
Mobile,AL
Member since Dec 2012
4850 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Buddy of mines son just joined the Air Force and I am fairly certain he kept his cell phone through basic. He sure did text home a lot. I went through Air Force basic in 92...they could still get a little physical with you and yell at you and be pretty demeaning. Now, apparently they have stress cards you can present and they can’t yell at you again for like an hour. I wish I was joking.


This is NOT happening in the Navy. My nephew is there right now and we did not even here from him for the 1st 3 weeks except for the phone call saying he arrived. They absolutely do not allow cell phones in Navy boot camp.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23802 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 9:28 am to
The court refused to hear it.
Posted by UAinSOUTHAL
Mobile,AL
Member since Dec 2012
4850 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Personally, I think a 2 year conscription would with a 4 year Reserve Status would do wonders for this generation. The "Free Education" crowd would see a generation of kids learning meaningful trades that could make them a damn fine living in the civilian world.


I agree 100% with this. Would need to be some exceptions for students who receive scholarships etc. but the vast majority of teenagers could use/benefit from serving.
This post was edited on 6/7/21 at 9:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram