- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Upon what authority, if any, may universities mandate medical treatments?
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:21 pm
Explain your answer.
6
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:23 pm to LSUStar
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:29 pm to LSUStar
Private or public universities?
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:30 pm to SpotCheckBilly
That answer is nonresponsive. Just because they now have a requirement does not mean that it is in any way done under proper authority. Want to try again?
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:31 pm to Wiseguy
Why would that matter?
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:34 pm to LSUStar
It's called - "In Loco Parentis".
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:39 pm to Eurocat
quote:
"In Loco Parentis".
You fricking racist!
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:44 pm to Eurocat
And that is statutory and all 50 states? Or is it just a Barnum statement? Explain for all what it means if you will.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:45 pm to Eurocat
Up where I am, Indiana University is requiring that students take the jab. Purdue, where my son goes to school, is having a drawing where vaccinated students will enter a drawing in which 10 students will win free tuition for a year, but Purdue has no mandate in place.
My son has decided not to take the jab. He's not at risk and understands that we don't know the long term effects.
My son has decided not to take the jab. He's not at risk and understands that we don't know the long term effects.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:51 pm to Jax-Tiger
Anyone who thinks that an educational institution has a warrant for coercing medical treatment abnegates the vital role of informed consent. Without informed consent medical treatment becomes coerced experimentation.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:55 pm to LSUStar
Like any authoritarian power, they'll take and take as long as no one is pushing back and MAKING them stop.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:58 pm to RadicalRedhead
That's right, the time for push back is passing by. It won't get better on it's own.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 12:59 pm to LSUStar
They can't. They'll all be sued eventually.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:04 pm to LSUStar
quote:
Just because they now have a requirement does not mean that it is in any way done under proper authority. Want to try again?
Most states have health codes passed into law by their legislatures that mandate certain vaccine requirements for public school students. That’s the most basic answer.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:07 pm to LSUStar
quote:
Anyone who thinks that an educational institution has a warrant for coercing medical treatment abnegates the vital role of informed consent.
Informed consent is not the job of the educational institution. It’s the job of the medical provider administering the vaccination. And if you have a valid medical contraindication to vaccination this is when you can obtain a medical exemption.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:51 am to Roger Klarvin
Your answer makes no sense. It assumes that there is no imperative for informed consent.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:52 am to Roger Klarvin
I guess that suffices for someone with the most basic understanding, but still off target. Thanks for playing.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:55 am to LSUStar
quote:
guess that suffices for someone with the most basic understanding, but still off target. Thanks for playing.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:57 am to LSUStar
Jacobson v. Massachusetts.
Also Blue v. Beach, 155 Indiana 121; Morris v. City of Columbus, 102 Georgia 792; State v. Hay, 126 N.Car. 999; Abeel v. Clark, 84 California 226; Bissell v. Davidson, 65 Connecticut 18; Hazen v. Strong, 2 Vermont 427; Duffield v. Williamsport School District, 162 Pa.St. 476.
I’m not explaining my answer. Do your own research.
Also Blue v. Beach, 155 Indiana 121; Morris v. City of Columbus, 102 Georgia 792; State v. Hay, 126 N.Car. 999; Abeel v. Clark, 84 California 226; Bissell v. Davidson, 65 Connecticut 18; Hazen v. Strong, 2 Vermont 427; Duffield v. Williamsport School District, 162 Pa.St. 476.
I’m not explaining my answer. Do your own research.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 8:58 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News