Do you even bother the READ the articles you shitpost here?

The unit changed its ARTWORK. Nothing more. The symbol WAS a pitbull, and the symbol REMAINS a pitbull.

The unit reverted to its ORIGINAL artwork (shown below):

Why? Because they learned that their NEW artwork bears a striking resemblance to the artwork of the mascot of a skinhead White Supremacist group:

3/4 (or more) of the participants on this forum are not going to read the article and are just going to post (and get their jimmies rustled) by the BS summary that you put in the OP.

Which is OBVIOUSLY exactly what you intend.

This post was edited on 3/16/21 at 12:52 pm

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Flats

Member since Jul 2019

21909 posts

Posted on 3/16/21 at 12:53 pm to AggieHank86

quote:
Because they learned that their NEW artwork bears a striking resemblance to the artwork of the mascot of a skinhead White Supremacist group:

That’s almost certainly generic clip art someone snagged off the internet, not actual artwork from some skinhead group.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by dgnx6

Baton Rouge

Member since Feb 2006

68941 posts

Posted on 3/16/21 at 6:16 pm to AggieHank86

You aren't wrong in this case but Nazis did and used a lot of things people consume today.

And I wonder more about who searches for this shite to be offended by? I would have gone the rest of my life not seeing those images if I hadn't opened this thread.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Azkiger

Member since Nov 2016

21805 posts

Posted on 3/16/21 at 6:16 pm to AggieHank86

quote:
AggieHank86

Thanks for the additional context, but I think it does little to change the story in the OP, outside of the assumption by many that the original poorly drawn pitbull was the patch that was replaced.

Both stories are retarded AF.

We shouldn't allow skinheads to turn generic splash art into forbidden racist symbols.

Honestly, I wish the Klan would start flying flags with Floyd's face on it just to see the reaction from the left.