- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pit bulls are racist now?
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:19 pm to Philzilla2k
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:19 pm to Philzilla2k
Dak Prescott is going to need new pets.
This post was edited on 3/16/21 at 1:21 pm
0
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:23 pm to Flats
quote:Yeah, it looks like the skinheads and the engineering squadron both started from the same clipart-type image. Neither seems to have changed it much.
That’s almost certainly generic clip art someone snagged off the internet, not actual artwork from some skinhead group.
I am NOT calling this squadron Nazis. But the swastika was once a generic religious symbol. Once it was co-opted by the Nazis, I would certainly understand an organization wanting to change any of its artwork that incorporates the swastika.
This post was edited on 3/16/21 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:32 pm to Ailsa
Can we declare bras as white supremacist now plz?
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:33 pm to Ailsa
Well, as long as the ADL says it's racist it must be.
Pits are more trashy than racist.
Pits are more trashy than racist.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:41 pm to Ailsa
Now pit bulls are racist and non-white wives are sex slaves owned by white racists.
And Capt America is gay.
Clown World on steroids.
And Capt America is gay.
Clown World on steroids.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am NOT calling this squadron Nazis. But the swastika
I know you’re not comparing clip art of a dog pulled from the internet to the Nazi symbol, because that would be silly.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:52 pm to Ailsa
Someone has never been to the hood.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:54 pm to Flats
quote:Agreed. I am simply saying that I understand why an organization might want to change artwork that includes elements which have negative connotations for many people.
I know you’re not comparing clip art of a dog pulled from the internet to the Nazi symbol, because that would be silly.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:54 pm to Ailsa
How is a pit bull racist?
Many black business owners here keep them on their property to dissuade criminals at night.
Many black business owners here keep them on their property to dissuade criminals at night.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:55 pm to Ailsa
Black Dogs love them some pit bulls.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:55 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
Wait, aren’t pits black people dogs?
It is the Black dog of choice....at least down here they are!
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:56 pm to shinerfan
quote:
international symbol of short, trashy people
No need to drag Mingo into this
Posted on 3/16/21 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am NOT calling this squadron Nazis. But the swastika was once a generic religious symbol. Once it was co-opted by the Nazis, I would certainly understand an organization wanting to change any of its artwork that incorporates the swastika.
Co-opted like the rainbow and butterfly? The rainbow was Gods promise not to flood the world again and MKUltra uses the butterfly...among other symbols.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 2:19 pm to Ailsa
um pit bulls are inner cities #1 pets, so?
Posted on 3/16/21 at 2:26 pm to Ailsa
quote:Uh, yeah, I suppose something like that.
Co-opted like the rainbow and butterfly? The rainbow was Gods promise not to flood the world again and MKUltra uses the butterfly...among other symbols.
If God chooses to do so, I would certainly not oppose Him sending an email to the Vatican Press, asking them to remove rainbow references from the Bible.
If He does not do that, would it be reasonable to assume that He is not opposed to those uses of the butterfly or rainbow as a symbol?
This post was edited on 3/16/21 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 3/16/21 at 3:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Agreed. I am simply saying that I understand why an organization might want to change artwork that includes elements which have negative connotations for many people.
It’s the “for many people” that fails here.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 3:25 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Patch linked to white supremacy.
Freaking joke.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 3:27 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If He does not do that, would it be reasonable to assume that He is not opposed to those uses of the butterfly or rainbow as a symbol?
And if he does, will you accept that he does have a problem with those uses of the butterfly or rainbow as a symbol ? Of course if this is the case, I think you’ll have a lot more to think about...
Posted on 3/16/21 at 3:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If God chooses to do so, I would certainly not oppose Him sending an email to the Vatican Press, asking them to remove rainbow references from the Bible.
They have already removed many plain and precious things from the bible.
Posted on 3/16/21 at 3:32 pm to Ailsa
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News