- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Twitter sues Texas AG for investigating censorship on their platform
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:55 pm
quote:
AP News
Twitter has filed a lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, claiming the Republican used his office to retaliate against it for banning the account of former President Donald Trump following the riot at the U.S. Capitol.
Days after the deadly January insurrection, Paxton announced an investigation into Twitter and four other major technology companies for what he called “the seemingly coordinated de-platforming of the President.” The attorney general’s office demanded that the companies produce a variety of records related to their content moderation policies and troves of internal communications.
quote:
In December, Paxton led 10 Republican attorneys general in suing Google for allegedly running an illegal digital-advertising monopoly in cahoots with Facebook.
quote:
Twitter’s counterpunch comes as states, in addition to federal lawmakers and governments outside the U.S., are cracking down on tech companies they see as having amassed too much power in the past decade. This includes antitrust and anti-monopoly regulation, internet privacy laws as well as attempts to regulate how platforms like Twitter, Facebook and others moderate their sites.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:57 pm to goofball
An investigation is retaliation now? 
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:57 pm to goofball
Dorsey is a big fricking pussy... he can dish it, but can't take it. Hope this sticks.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:58 pm to goofball
Good, government needs to leave private companies alone as long as they are not breaking laws.
If you the public don't like what a private company is legally doing, for fricks sakes stop using that company.
If you the public don't like what a private company is legally doing, for fricks sakes stop using that company.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:58 pm to goofball
Big Tech Social Media demanding free speech ehh?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:59 pm to 101011110
quote:
If you the public don't like what a private company is legally doing, for fricks sakes stop using that company.
Like use Parler instead?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:01 pm to goofball
quote:
Like use Parler instead?
Stop using the company that deplatformed them.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:01 pm to goofball
So let me get this straight. Twitter can sue people but people can’t sue Twitter because of section 230.
Seems a little fricked up no?
Seems a little fricked up no?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:02 pm to 101011110
quote:
Stop using the company that deplatformed them.
Amazon and Microsoft?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:02 pm to goofball
quote:
deadly January insurrection
They love to say this. Like we lost 1,000 people bleeding out on the Capitol steps.
It's so obvious what they are doing and most people can't see it.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:03 pm to 101011110
quote:
Good, government needs to leave private companies alone as long as they are not breaking laws.
Who says for sure they aren't? Would an investigation not determine that?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:04 pm to goofball
quote:
Amazon and Microsoft?
bUT mUh 2 day DeLiVErY
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:04 pm to goofball
Someone that rhymes with Mack Morsey should be strung up on a gibbet.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:17 pm to goofball
quote:
Days after the deadly January insurrection
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:18 pm to 101011110
quote:
Good, government needs to leave private companies alone as long as they are not breaking laws.
If you the public don't like what a private company is legally doing, for fricks sakes stop using that company.
Like a bakery?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:25 pm to goofball
quote:Yeah, I guess what he's arguing is for us to just stop using AWS which hosts a great deal of the internet and provides 63% of Amazon's profits.
Amazon and Microsoft?
Amazon isn't going anywhere even if millions decided to end their Prime sub immediately. Cute of the troll to think otherwise.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:27 pm to 101011110
quote:
If you the public don't like what a private company is legally doing, for fricks sakes stop using that company.
I totally forgot that private companies are typically cloaked in legislative immunity and granted special governmental protections. Who'd-a-thunk.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:28 pm to 101011110
quote:
Good, government needs to leave private companies alone as long as they are not breaking laws.
If you the public don't like what a private company is legally doing, for fricks sakes stop using that company.

Popular
Back to top

15








