Started By
Message

re: A not too kind assessment of the F-35 program.

Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by LSUtiger17
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2009
3082 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

“They tried to make the F-35 do too much,”


quote:

F-35s to replace aging F-16s and A-10s


Aren't the F-16 and A-10 vastly different aircraft designed to perform very different roles? Seems pretty obvious that one aircraft would have difficulty filling both roles.
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 12:37 pm
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Aren't the F-16 and A-10 vastly different aircraft designed to perform very different roles?


yes, there was a push back in the eighties to try and use the F-16 to take the role of the A-10 but

quote:

pretty obvious that one aircraft would have difficulty filling both roles.


Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30242 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Aren't the F-16 and A-10 vastly different aircraft designed to perform very different roles? Seems pretty obvious that one aircraft would have difficulty filling both roles.


The Air Force has almost zero interest in the close air support game. This was a way for them to get a shiny new toy while assuring the Army they were *wink* *wink* getting an improved CAS platform in the bargain.
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
10635 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 6:29 pm to
Seems pretty obvious that one aircraft would have difficulty filling both roles.
—that’s the way military brass thinks—just do it, regardless of the facts
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram