- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California legislator passes bill for anal sex with children
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to Pettifogger
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to Pettifogger
thats the thought i had. but i also have read stories of 18yr old seniors in high school who sleep with 14yr old freshmen in high school being put onthe sex offender registry for life. check out the OT sometime when a under 18 boy sleeps with a female teacher. he is hailed as a hero and the teacher a slut. reverse the genders and see how that conversation goes.
This post was edited on 9/3/20 at 11:34 am
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Not a single dem here will call this out. But next time Trump says mean things, they'll be blowing up this site. truly sick and deplorable human beings.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:35 am to bamarep
quote:
Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry, the San Fransisco Chronicle reported.
So a 20yr old can pound an 11yr old in the arse and that's not worthy of being on the sex-offender registry...
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:36 am to Strannix
"Honest your Honor, I didn't know he was seven, he told me he was nine."
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:37 am to hawkeye007
quote:
but i also have read stories of 18yr old seniors in high school who sleep with 14yr old freshmen in high school being put onthe sex offender registry for life.
There is no parallel universe in which this is a concern for the people pushing this.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:41 am to Strannix
The actual fricked up thing is this was already legal to do for heterosexual relationships. It's now just been expanded to homosexual relationships, both of these being vile. Like an 18 year old can now legally diddle a 9 year old is fricking sick.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:42 am to bird35
quote:If you have consensual sex with a girl in CA the judge can not require you to register. They just want the same rule to be applied to boy on boy.
So 22 and 12 is ok?
I hate it, I think it is grotesque, immoral and goofy. But they do have a point.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:42 am to Bard
So the current rape laws don’t change, just the ones for raping children? Who are these people? The system is breaking down fast, if laws don’t protect children parents will.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:43 am to tigerfoot
The point of the fix should be to limit it to an agreeable period less than 5 years while expanding it to cover non-vaginal sex.
Keeping the 10 year limit while expanding it to cover oral and anal has bad optics to say the least.
Keeping the 10 year limit while expanding it to cover oral and anal has bad optics to say the least.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:44 am to Strannix
Extermination of these people would not make me sad
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:44 am to hawkeye007
quote:
but i also have read stories of 18yr old seniors in high school who sleep with 14yr old freshmen in high school
If you're an 18 year old and you sleep with a 14 year old, you're a creep. 18/2=9 9+7=16. That's as low as you can go as an 18 year old is 16.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:45 am to teke184
quote:Oh, my personal view is that it is a terrible law. It is the kind of thing that could give Trump the election on a silver platter..and it should be weaponized and used against the left
The point of the fix should be to limit it to an agreeable period less than 5 years while expanding it to cover non-vaginal sex.
Keeping the 10 year limit while expanding it to cover oral and anal has bad optics to say the least.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:46 am to OMLandshark
I’d agree.
Used to know seniors who would “date” girls in middle school or 9th grade.
Only reason nothing was ever said, IMHO, was that their family pretty much owned the town they lived in so it was unlikely anyone would say boo about it.
Used to know seniors who would “date” girls in middle school or 9th grade.
Only reason nothing was ever said, IMHO, was that their family pretty much owned the town they lived in so it was unlikely anyone would say boo about it.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:46 am to tigerfoot
quote:
f you have consensual sex with a girl in CA the judge can not require you to register. They just want the same rule to be applied to boy on boy.
I hate it, I think it is grotesque, immoral and goofy. But they do have a point.
How does a 11 year old give consent to a 22 year old? Are they serious? God I hate what this country is becoming and it’s not surprising that California of all state protects pedophiles.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:48 am to tigerfoot
quote:
If you have consensual sex with a girl in CA the judge can not require you to register. They just want the same rule to be applied to boy on boy. I hate it, I think it is grotesque, immoral and goofy. But they do have a point.
They just have a law that an adult having sex with someone younger than 18 is illegal and leave it at that.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:50 am to 14&Counting
quote:
They just have a law that an adult having sex with someone younger than 18 is illegal and leave it at that.
I wouldn't mind a "Half your age plus 7" being added in there for the sake of 18-20 year olds, but that's it.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:52 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Like an 18 year old can now legally diddle a 9 year old is fricking sick.
Not even close to accurate.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News