Started By
Message

re: California legislator passes bill for anal sex with children

Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5903 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to
thats the thought i had. but i also have read stories of 18yr old seniors in high school who sleep with 14yr old freshmen in high school being put onthe sex offender registry for life. check out the OT sometime when a under 18 boy sleeps with a female teacher. he is hailed as a hero and the teacher a slut. reverse the genders and see how that conversation goes.
This post was edited on 9/3/20 at 11:34 am
Posted by Aggie2000
Member since Sep 2011
86 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to
Not a single dem here will call this out. But next time Trump says mean things, they'll be blowing up this site. truly sick and deplorable human beings.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51845 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry, the San Fransisco Chronicle reported.


So a 20yr old can pound an 11yr old in the arse and that's not worthy of being on the sex-offender registry...
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:36 am to
"Honest your Honor, I didn't know he was seven, he told me he was nine."

Posted by Larry_Hotdogs
Texas
Member since Jun 2019
1349 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:36 am to
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:37 am to
quote:

but i also have read stories of 18yr old seniors in high school who sleep with 14yr old freshmen in high school being put onthe sex offender registry for life.


There is no parallel universe in which this is a concern for the people pushing this.
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
5665 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:40 am to
“8 year olds, Dude.”
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109201 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:41 am to
The actual fricked up thing is this was already legal to do for heterosexual relationships. It's now just been expanded to homosexual relationships, both of these being vile. Like an 18 year old can now legally diddle a 9 year old is fricking sick.
Posted by GooseSix
Member since Jun 2012
19539 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:41 am to
Absolute filth.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56522 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:42 am to
quote:

So 22 and 12 is ok?

If you have consensual sex with a girl in CA the judge can not require you to register. They just want the same rule to be applied to boy on boy.

I hate it, I think it is grotesque, immoral and goofy. But they do have a point.
Posted by jt696
Member since Dec 2007
4886 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:42 am to
So the current rape laws don’t change, just the ones for raping children? Who are these people? The system is breaking down fast, if laws don’t protect children parents will.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96515 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:43 am to
The point of the fix should be to limit it to an agreeable period less than 5 years while expanding it to cover non-vaginal sex.

Keeping the 10 year limit while expanding it to cover oral and anal has bad optics to say the least.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79379 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:44 am to
Extermination of these people would not make me sad
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109201 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:44 am to
quote:

but i also have read stories of 18yr old seniors in high school who sleep with 14yr old freshmen in high school


If you're an 18 year old and you sleep with a 14 year old, you're a creep. 18/2=9 9+7=16. That's as low as you can go as an 18 year old is 16.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56522 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:45 am to
quote:

The point of the fix should be to limit it to an agreeable period less than 5 years while expanding it to cover non-vaginal sex.

Keeping the 10 year limit while expanding it to cover oral and anal has bad optics to say the least.


Oh, my personal view is that it is a terrible law. It is the kind of thing that could give Trump the election on a silver platter..and it should be weaponized and used against the left
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96515 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:46 am to
I’d agree.

Used to know seniors who would “date” girls in middle school or 9th grade.

Only reason nothing was ever said, IMHO, was that their family pretty much owned the town they lived in so it was unlikely anyone would say boo about it.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10484 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

f you have consensual sex with a girl in CA the judge can not require you to register. They just want the same rule to be applied to boy on boy.

I hate it, I think it is grotesque, immoral and goofy. But they do have a point.




How does a 11 year old give consent to a 22 year old? Are they serious? God I hate what this country is becoming and it’s not surprising that California of all state protects pedophiles.

Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37715 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:48 am to
quote:

If you have consensual sex with a girl in CA the judge can not require you to register. They just want the same rule to be applied to boy on boy. I hate it, I think it is grotesque, immoral and goofy. But they do have a point.


They just have a law that an adult having sex with someone younger than 18 is illegal and leave it at that.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109201 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:50 am to
quote:

They just have a law that an adult having sex with someone younger than 18 is illegal and leave it at that.



I wouldn't mind a "Half your age plus 7" being added in there for the sake of 18-20 year olds, but that's it.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23123 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Like an 18 year old can now legally diddle a 9 year old is fricking sick.


Not even close to accurate.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram