Started By
Message

re: Lawsuit claims Lamont Cole does not live in the district he represents

Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:57 am to
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30680 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:57 am to
quote:

They say Cole currently resides at 438 Bellewood Drive, which is located one block outside of the district's boundaries.

This makes it sound frivolous. But then:
quote:

The lawsuit claims Cole improperly listed his domicile address as 665 N. 39th St. when he qualified for reelection on Friday. That is "an abandoned property without working electricity," the petition states.

Obvious fricking fraud
quote:

Judge Trudy White

Won’t do anything
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96935 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 9:17 am to
Trudy making the call to do nothing strengthens the chances that a similar disqualification case against a mayor-President candidate gets tossed.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3410 posts
Posted on 7/31/20 at 9:14 am to
quote:

quote:
They say Cole currently resides at 438 Bellewood Drive, which is located one block outside of the district's boundaries.

This makes it sound frivolous. But then:


How does that make it sound frivolous?

You either live within the district boundaries or you don't.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram