- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawsuit claims Lamont Cole does not live in the district he represents
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:57 am to JudgeRoyBean
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:57 am to JudgeRoyBean
quote:
They say Cole currently resides at 438 Bellewood Drive, which is located one block outside of the district's boundaries.
This makes it sound frivolous. But then:
quote:
The lawsuit claims Cole improperly listed his domicile address as 665 N. 39th St. when he qualified for reelection on Friday. That is "an abandoned property without working electricity," the petition states.
Obvious fricking fraud
quote:
Judge Trudy White
Won’t do anything
Posted on 7/30/20 at 9:17 am to Upperdecker
Trudy making the call to do nothing strengthens the chances that a similar disqualification case against a mayor-President candidate gets tossed.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 9:14 am to Upperdecker
quote:
quote:
They say Cole currently resides at 438 Bellewood Drive, which is located one block outside of the district's boundaries.
This makes it sound frivolous. But then:
How does that make it sound frivolous?
You either live within the district boundaries or you don't.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)