- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
Gorsuch with a funny dissent
Posted on 7/28/20 at 11:56 am
Posted on 7/28/20 at 11:56 am
Posted on 7/28/20 at 11:58 am to Wolfosaurus
And no one in the media reported on this.....this is written to where even Hank Johnson might be able to understand it.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:00 pm to Wolfosaurus
It's a shame that it was a dissent.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:00 pm to Wolfosaurus
Gorsuch is right. There standard is not applied evenly and as a result, it makes it so you can gamble or watch movies in public but not worship God, which is supposed to be Constitutionally protected.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:01 pm to Wolfosaurus
Where is the funny part?
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:02 pm to Wolfosaurus
5-4.
Guess which frickbag justice joined the psychopath leftists?
Guess which frickbag justice joined the psychopath leftists?
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:03 pm to Wolfosaurus
Frankly, I'm over the love affair with Gorsuch. He writes a good, short opinion every now and then, but people forget he literally just judicially updated Title VII and declared half of Oklahoma as Indian Territory.
He's going to be battling the Chief soon for crossover awards.
He's going to be battling the Chief soon for crossover awards.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:03 pm to Wolfosaurus
Not funny. It is based on reason and equal justice under the law. But I see. That comes out of the Supreme Court so rarely these days that those terms seem humorous in association with that body.
Screw John Roberts. Turncoat.
Screw John Roberts. Turncoat.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:21 pm to Wolfosaurus
It’s not funny, it’s dead on correct.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 12:29 pm to Wolfosaurus
It’s incredibly sad, and TD is the only place I’ve seen it discussed since it came out Friday night. People have no clue.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 1:43 pm to Wolfosaurus
LINK
Here is the opinion from a similar case two months before with the same outcome. What states realize is that you can‘t tell people how to worship and enforce that because that would be unconstitutional. Instead they are limiting occupancy and letting people worship however they want. States can write Governors orders for restaurants on all kinds of required safety measures and fine businesses if they fail to follow those orders. There’s no way for government to tell a church to not drink from a shared cup and fine them for doing so.
It’s a pragmatic decision. The court doesn’t want to approve an injunction for emergency orders during a pandemic when churches are still allowed to operate.
Here is the opinion from a similar case two months before with the same outcome. What states realize is that you can‘t tell people how to worship and enforce that because that would be unconstitutional. Instead they are limiting occupancy and letting people worship however they want. States can write Governors orders for restaurants on all kinds of required safety measures and fine businesses if they fail to follow those orders. There’s no way for government to tell a church to not drink from a shared cup and fine them for doing so.
It’s a pragmatic decision. The court doesn’t want to approve an injunction for emergency orders during a pandemic when churches are still allowed to operate.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 2:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)