re: Twitter to cancel all “Q Anon” groups

quote:

---

It sucks, but I think our dirty, corrupt world continues like it has for decades

---

Of course it will. As much as we all would like to see a "draining of the swamp", it's not going to happen and it has not been happening.

This shite, the "Deep State", has been a part of our nation for a hundred yrs or more, and it's deeply rooted.

No one or two term president is going to put a dent in that. To think otherwise is delusional.

It's going to take multiple consecutive terms of Trump like efforts to dent that shite. JMO

quote:

---

I'd say when q isn't needed for reelection purposes, it just kind of goes away, with some of the hardcores continuing to grasp at every straw. I could see imposters trying to continue the q drops, with the validation needed to support it being an arrest here and there.

---

You could be right. It would be a crisis, for sure, but like Doomsday cults that reach their predicted date of the end of the world, they may lose supporters, but they usually don't end when the prediction doesn't come true. Plus, if Biden is president, there will be plenty of work for Q to do against the Deep State traitors. These CT's don't just end in these online ecosystems, they transform (like pizzagate getting incorporated into the next thing). Plus, the profit opportunities for Watkins are tremendous if he could get Trump on board - it would make Alex Jones' boner-pill operation look miniscule.

quote:

---

I didn't see that as trolling, but an appeal to the Q-folk since Q had told them to "Trust Sessions". He wasn't willing to do it earlier for what should be obvious reasons, but went there as a last-ditch deal when his prospects looked bad at the end.

---

Okay he used them like a rug to cover dirt and lied like a rug. It is a form of trolling.

quote:

---

If there are no big name arrests you will still follow Q?

---

If Trump leaves office in 2025 and no one's been arrested, we all have problems.

ETA - re: Anchoring - It's counter productive to participate actively in a discussion and then ask for it to be nuked. Until the arrests start to come in, folks are naturally going to be skeptical to the point of downright cynicism, which is where we are today.

I've always understood the why behind the skepticism. It's the cynicism among the folks who claim to be MAGA-but... that I take issue with.

quote:

---

Leave it to Q to utilize this platform being hosted by a Russian provider

---

Plausible deniability.

And for the life of me, I won't understand why TSLG would be worried about Trump ever confirming himself to be a part of the Q team. I don't expect him to for the same plausible deniability reasons. If he does, it won't be until after all the dust has settled.

We know this because Q has said that his final drops will trigger a "self destruct" mechanism (implies Q will drop some stuff at the end will be sensitive in nature). Trump won't link himself to this stuff until and unless the coast is clear to do so.

It should be obvious to anyone paying attention though. General Flynn's entire damn family supports Q. Flynn's lawyer just the other day tweeted something tangentially supportive of Q when she retweeted Chrissy Teigan's threat to leave if something isn't don't about Q and basically said, "bye, bitch." And just yesterday Richard Grenelle took to Twitter to defend Q against someone who was claiming Qanons have sex with kids or some shite.

They've done everything they can to confirm it without outright confirming it. They may never confirm it. Won't matter. What matters is cleaning out the corruption. Don't care how we get there so long as we get there.

This just proves Q is legit. Why would they ban something that is “just a bunch of bs”?

The deep state is scared. Very scared.

quote:

---

lsuguy84

---

Is there a scenario in which you realize/admit it’s not real or not what you think it is?

Does the sea serpent guy still post here?

If you are on twitter you are just as retarded as the other retards on twitter