- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Twitter to cancel all “Q Anon” groups
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:57 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:57 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
The left wants to defeat Trump by putting eyeballs/sunlight directly on the myriad sick shite they've done, both in public and private?
I'll call my shot now.
In the next couple of months, the msm will keep focusing on the crazies involved with the movement. And, it is filled with crazies that have chased every theory under the sun for years.
Then, they will ask the question, and it will not go how we would like it to go. He won't admit involvement with the movement, but he won't condemn it either.
Those of you that lust over the possibility of being involved in the military op to save the world, thus giving life more meaning, will make every excuse as to why Trump didn't directly, and expressly, state his involvement, and you will continue making excuses as to why it hasn't happened yet.
As we get closer to the election, the bad guys will continue to spotlight the crazy shite from the crazies, while knocking Trump for his indirect involvement with his retweets, Dan's tweets, etc. They will continue to use it as a way to make the right look like loons.
Then, Trump will have a decision to make: he can either keep his mouth shut and keep his free campaign workers spreading some memes, or he can protect himself by stepping away and denying involvement.
Since the majority of the movement doesn't do shite, and it isn't "bigger than we think," I'd guess that he chooses the latter as the safest move. Depending on how effective the msm is in making us look like crazies, he might even have to let Dan or flynn lie in front of the bus on this one.
Then, more normal, active participants will step away, similar to how we've lost a lot of normal people over the last 2.75 years. It will leave a movement with a few normals, like yourself, who won't let themselves believe that q isn't exactly what he says, and the crazies, who have been spewing theories for decades.
Bookmark this shite.
ETA: And, I'm at the top of page 8; 1 plus 7 equals? If that's not proof that I'm a time traveller, you're just a moron. (is this how it works)
This post was edited on 7/23/20 at 1:01 pm
3
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:04 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
What is your fine line you cross?
I've stated many times, my finish line is the day DJT leaves office as President.
quote:
They are good guys.
Being hired by this WH is NOT a guarantee of character. Tillerson. Mattis. Scaramucci.
The simplest explanation is that each of the people you named are not in the loop. They feed on a steady diet of Beltway conjecture and MSM coverage, even when they know it's informational junk food. 2000+ hit pieces on Q, and only half a dozen on any outlet that has been positive.
Open Image in New Tab to read mice type:
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:11 pm to TSLG
I see your bruised ego from not being taken seriously in the QThread is boiling over.
And to think we all could've avoided being embarrassed if we'd only listened to you and your overwhelming wisdom.
And to think we all could've avoided being embarrassed if we'd only listened to you and your overwhelming wisdom.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:22 pm to VoxDawg
Sebastian Gorka was appointed to the National Security Education Board.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:29 pm to TSLG
I think you were trolling the Q people and are now rubbing it in. You are as bad as the people making money off Q with books and ad clicks.
At least be kind about it and explain w/o rubbing it in your troll job how they were duped.
I want the bad guys put in prison; did you ever care or did you always know they wouldn't be?
At least be kind about it and explain w/o rubbing it in your troll job how they were duped.
I want the bad guys put in prison; did you ever care or did you always know they wouldn't be?
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:33 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I see your bruised ego from not being taken seriously in the QThread is boiling over.
And to think we all could've avoided being embarrassed if we'd only listened to you and your overwhelming wisdom.
Only one of us takes the sports message board serious enough to have a bruised ego; only one of us finds any type of validation from the sports message board.
I am 100% for draining the swamp and getting Trump reelected. At one time, I thought the q stuff would help, but, at this point, I don't think it will.
Listened to me about what? That I think q people can have more affect on helping Trump get reelected by volunteering to work in campaigns all over the country than not? Who can disagree with that?
I hope you're right. I hope that we can just sit back, watch the world fix itself, and you can one day tell your grandkids about that time that q linked to your Twitter during the operation to save the world.
But, what if we can't?
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:36 pm to TSLG
This is literally every post you've made in the Q Thread:
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:38 pm to TSLG
Interesting ideas.
If Trump doesn't claim participation in Q before the election, do you think it more or less likely that he does so afterwards (or at least after leaving office)? A loss would be so humiliating to him, he would be looking to lay blame on the deep state and wanting to continue to portray himself as a winner (there would need to be some betrayal narrative in there to manage the contradictions, obviously).
If Trump doesn't claim participation in Q before the election, do you think it more or less likely that he does so afterwards (or at least after leaving office)? A loss would be so humiliating to him, he would be looking to lay blame on the deep state and wanting to continue to portray himself as a winner (there would need to be some betrayal narrative in there to manage the contradictions, obviously).
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:42 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
that their competitors don’t
What competitor of Twitter doesn’t have Section 230 available to them?
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:43 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Sebastian Gorka was appointed to the National Security Education Board.
He's totally entitled to his opinion. Personally, I think he's so venomous on the subject of Q since he clearly didn't get invited to the dance.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:43 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I think you were trolling the Q people and are now rubbing it in.
I'll agree that I'm very trollish, but I left that shite out of the Q thread, for the most part.
If it ever comes to fruition that q people will be used to soften the blow after information is dropped that fricks people's worlds up, you'll get to see exactly why I turned myself into the annoying enemy #1.
I don't think it will though.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:44 pm to TSLG
quote:
nuh-uh! yOu ARe
Noted.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:50 pm to VoxDawg
I think it's bullshite that these accounts were scrubbed...we should be able to know who they are
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:51 pm to VoxDawg
quote:Don't you mean his opinion can't be deleted or anchored?
He's totally entitled to his opinion.
quote:This is silly. If Q was on the up and up Gilliam would know about it more so than a guy running a Q thread on TD.
Personally, I think he's so venomous on the subject of Q since he clearly didn't get invited to the dance.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:55 pm to Yak
All of the key Q players are still going on Twitter. I think there were Q bots removed. Now it is an excuse to call out people like Scavino and get them shamed and or booted off twitter. But mostly shame them as being loons...
Even the most diehard Q believer has to know it looks loony. When Sessions trolled Q people to try to win; some Q followers melted down. I think some would back Q theories over God & Trump...
Even the most diehard Q believer has to know it looks loony. When Sessions trolled Q people to try to win; some Q followers melted down. I think some would back Q theories over God & Trump...
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:03 pm to cajunangelle
I do wonder how much money the pig farmer in Manila has made from all of this
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:05 pm to cajunangelle
I didn't see that as trolling, but an appeal to the Q-folk since Q had told them to "Trust Sessions". He wasn't willing to do it earlier for what should be obvious reasons, but went there as a last-ditch deal when his prospects looked bad at the end.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:05 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
If Trump doesn't claim participation in Q before the election, do you think it more or less likely that he does so afterwards
Honestly, I think the q movement dwindles into obscurity after the election.
I think Q was the plan to focus those that the Trump team said were important in 16, which is why the campaign hasn't actively had to promote the 4chan, meme types for 20. You don't give them props in 16 and completely ignore them in 20.
Winners do what it takes. They take advantage of every opportunity, just like sessions tried to do in the last days of his campaign.
I'd say when q isn't needed for reelection purposes, it just kind of goes away, with some of the hardcores continuing to grasp at every straw. I could see imposters trying to continue the q drops, with the validation needed to support it being an arrest here and there.
I do think that Trump is trying to drain the swamp, but I think we will have a little swamp draining and not a q level swamp draining.
It sucks, but I think our dirty, corrupt world continues like it has for decades, with us praying for a world where nobody is above the law.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:07 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Don't you mean his opinion can't be deleted or anchored?
I've yet to call for the anchoring of a single thread, so you're barking up the wrong tree.
I'd like to think that the simple fact that I don't mind debating the topic outside of the QT would support that, too. I make it a point to engage folks in Obamagate-adjacent threads, because getting justice for what was done is my #1 priority. Rarely, if ever, am I the one to turn a non-Q thread into one, but if someone feels froggy, I have no problem jumping.
On some days, there can be a subset of malcontents in the QT aren't worth killing, so I don't engage them.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:11 pm to Yak
Watkins, yeah he is sleazy.
Does he still run Japanese porn?
Does he still run Japanese porn?
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News