Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court - "Sex discrimination" includes gay and transgender discrimination

Posted on 6/15/20 at 9:22 am to
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20889 posts
Posted on 6/15/20 at 9:22 am to
I'm not going to judge it until I read the actual opinion, but I'm going to be very disappointed if they chose to create a new protected class while also refusing to hear several extremely important 2nd amendment cases.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 6/15/20 at 9:24 am to
quote:

I'm not going to judge it until I read the actual opinion, but I'm going to be very disappointed if they chose to create a new protected class while also refusing to hear several extremely important 2nd amendment cases.


That appears to be exactly what happened today. All the pending 2nd Amendment cases were rejected this morning, and Title VII was read to include terms the text does not cover.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19310 posts
Posted on 6/15/20 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I'm going to be very disappointed if they chose to create a new protected class while also refusing to hear several extremely important 2nd amendment cases

This. I couldn't care less about the lgbtq decision here, but I want to hear a single good reason they won't rule on some of those disputed 2A cases.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram