Started By
Message
locked post

RR or JM?

Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:19 pm
Posted by thatguy777
br
Member since Feb 2007
2506 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:19 pm
If we could only have one or the other?...I was talking to a friend about it and we both agreed that RR is more important. It seems as if Davenport will most likely choose LSU but I feel we are lacking WR in this class and with the loss of Benton, Byrd leaving, and possibly Lafell getting drafted we need a big time WR. Thoughts?
Posted by drewb808
The top notch
Member since Feb 2007
5687 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:20 pm to
TT is small-time now?

CT also?
This post was edited on 7/19/08 at 4:22 pm
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13683 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:23 pm to
i would take RR. not b/c JM isnt great, but b/c we are aready (probably) getting davenport, and RR is a wr where we need more depth, and lastly, b/c RR is a louisiana kid. i would hate to pick, but id say randle
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:23 pm to
This is easy RR...we need a bigtime receiver behind TT. We have plenty of depth at DT, plus Davenport coming.
Posted by MTB
Houston
Member since Aug 2007
1432 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:34 pm to
After looking at the depth chart we could lose 4-5 DLs after this year. Not to mention the number of OL converts from the DL...... If I had to choose at gunpoint I would take JM.
Posted by DollaChoppa
I Simp for ACC
Member since May 2008
84774 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:37 pm to
JM
Posted by tigerbill002
Member since May 2008
2317 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 4:46 pm to
RR, we'll get CD for sure and we need to land at least one big WR this year. I think we are sitting pretty with the WR we have offered this year and are bound to get some quality guys. I really want that CD JM combo though. That would be sick. Imagine the line. Brockers--Davenport--McFarland--Agheyere.

So it really matters who else we get. If we get no other WR then we need RR. If we get no other DL then its JM. If today was signing day RR.
Posted by LordoftheManor
Member since Jul 2006
8371 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 5:00 pm to
Randle easy
Posted by Luke4LSU
Member since Oct 2007
11986 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 5:21 pm to
Randle. If we don't get JM, we get CD & Sentimore.
Posted by jrenton
Houston
Member since Mar 2007
1994 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 5:35 pm to
I am a big fan of d-line depth and believe that was the root of our two national championship teams. For that reason, I'll take JM.
Posted by FanInLA
Member since May 2008
4967 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 6:14 pm to
RR, we got to get him.
Posted by LSUTGR69
San Diegeaux
Member since Jul 2004
9934 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 7:01 pm to
Rueben! Kid is a beast. The things he will do at LSU will bring in top WR recruits for years
Posted by Raz
Member since Oct 2006
8371 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 8:30 pm to
quote:


TT is small-time now?


I been thinking the same thing lately... TT gets no love.
Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1805 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 9:38 pm to
I like our wide recievers, I just love to see the LA boys stay at home. God, it would be nice to have them both!
Posted by wmrebel74
Member since Mar 2007
2839 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

LSUTGR69


How is he on grades? B/c I hate to get so excited over a player that cant qualify. Prime example Deangelo Benton. People were talking about him coming in as a true freshman and being in the rotation at WR. I hope RR has the grades.
Posted by LSUTGR69
San Diegeaux
Member since Jul 2004
9934 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 10:27 pm to
Rueben is an exceptional student. No issue at all.
Posted by Nola
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2008
3 posts
Posted on 7/19/08 at 11:41 pm to
JM without question
Posted by BayouCatFan
Member since Jul 2008
4580 posts
Posted on 7/20/08 at 5:03 am to
Both have potential to be college All Americans. ALl American DTs are harder to find than All American WRs. If I had my choice it would have to be JM, but I will say I would be thrilled with either one.
Posted by kennymorgan
Bella Vista, AR
Member since Dec 2005
4729 posts
Posted on 7/20/08 at 7:44 am to
I want both. I do not wish to have to choose which I would rather have. Both are LSU type players. I actually believe both will be Tigers.
Posted by H-Town Tiger 98
Houston, Texas
Member since Jul 2005
4545 posts
Posted on 7/20/08 at 4:58 pm to
WRs are nice to have. DTs are a necessity. Don't get me wrong, I want RR to be a Tiger. But a WR needs a QB to get him the ball if he wants to have an impact. A DT can have an impact on every damn play.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram