- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candace Owens hires Covington catholic lawyer to go after Facebook
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:43 pm to CapperVin
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:43 pm to CapperVin
quote:
Why doesn’t she find another platform to spew her bullshite on?
Why doesn’t the platform act as a platform, rather than a publisher? And why doesn’t the platform uphold their own rules, rather than censoring ideas and philosophies that it doesn’t agree with? And if it intends to censor content and ideas, simply because it disagrees with that content and ideas, how can it possibly maintain the outright lie that it is simply a platform?
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:43 pm to Lindbergh
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/10/20 at 9:52 am
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:44 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:
And yet some people call her a fraud.
She is
How is Facebook breaking the constitution
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:47 pm to CapperVin
quote:
Why doesn’t she find another platform to spew her bull shite on?
Google and Facebook control 80% of advertising so they can put any other competition out of business.
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:51 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Roger Klarvin
Can't have an intelligent black woman walking off the plantation now can we.
quote:
I find her exhausting. Even when she makes a valid point, her social media histrionics are every bit as bad as the sky screamers she bitches about. She has cluster B personality disorder written all over he.
She's a voice - one that is able to reach people because of her skin color so they can't censor her the same way they do white people. The fact that she's female doesn't hurt.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:52 pm to cwill
quote:
That think like you, that act like you
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:53 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
If you go to a restaurant that has shitty service, do you continue to go back? No.
Not if you are going for the food. But if every time you go, there are a hundred people there waiting to here from you, you would continue to go.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:54 pm to thelawnwranglers
The dominant social media companies must choose: if they are neutral platforms, they should have immunity from litigation. If they are publishers making editorial choices, then they should relinquish this valuable exemption. They can’t claim that Section 230 immunity is necessary to protect free speech, while they shape, control, and censor the speech on their platforms.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:01 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
The dominant social media companies must choose: if they are neutral platforms, they should have immunity from litigation. If they are publishers making editorial choices, then they should relinquish this valuable exemption. They can’t claim that Section 230 immunity is necessary to protect free speech, while they shape, control, and censor the speech on their platforms.
Exactly this.
It will be interesting in the future if someone goes after FB due to their actions as a publisher. This isn't it IMO, but it will be hard for FB to describe their actions as a platform and not a publisher.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:02 pm to boosiebadazz
Publisher or platform? Clearly you saw this was the point, right?
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:15 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
You don't agree?
Lol no Charlie Kirk, I don't agree.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:18 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
She is
Yes
quote:
How is Facebook breaking the constitution
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:19 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
Google and Facebook control 80% of advertising
And who controls Google and Facebook
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:20 pm to Lindbergh
quote:
Whats your point that we should be a borderless
No.
quote:
mocha colored people
Here we go....nationalist that happens to be whhhhhite.
quote:
with nothing but consumer products to define our individual selves? Because that's the alternative to nationalism
You’ve been online too long...it’s obvious you fricks or just repurposed anarchocapitalist nerds...or just morons.
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 11:22 pm
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:22 pm to FlexDawg
I support this but she should also have a Parler Account and support conservative friendly Social Media.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:28 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
Publisher or platform?
You people waiting for a court decision remedy on this and everything else are going to be disappointed. The court system is there so that if magically the cosmopolitan elite that control both parties with an iron grip don't get their way on something they can just wave it into power from the judge's bench. See: marriage, gay.
You live in a kritarchy. Your government is illegitimate. Your elections are illegitimate. Your society is now essentially a propaganda operation. But hey....
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:32 pm to cwill
quote:
nationalist that happens to be whhhhhite
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:40 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Can't have an intelligent black woman walking off the plantation now can we.
Yeah, that’s it
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:41 pm to Lindbergh
quote:
The court system is there so that if magically the cosmopolitan elite that control both parties with an iron grip don't get their way on something they can just wave it into power from the judge's bench.
It damn sure trends that way. Is there an example of the judiciary just creating conservative policy that failed at the ballot box? There’s got to be something, although nothing of the magnitude of abortion or gay marriage.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News