Started By
Message

re: I wonder if Stingley is a little ticked right now...

Posted on 4/26/20 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18491 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 4:07 pm to
So he won’t make as much in two more years?
OP is confusing
Posted by PhillyFan1994
Member since Sep 2012
2032 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

So he won’t make as much in two more years? OP is confusing


I'm sure the rookie scale will be higher so he will probably make more. But I learned in my Federal Income Tax class about something called the "Time Value of Money" and how acquiring revenue now is almost always preferable to deferring it to the future.
Posted by honeybadger07
The Woodlands
Member since Jul 2015
3263 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

So he won’t make as much in two more years? OP is confusing


Time value of money for one

2nd, assuming he’s plays the same amount of total football years, that would be two less years of lost income....and then again back to time value of money

Confused still?

Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39667 posts
Posted on 4/27/20 at 5:30 am to
quote:

So he won’t make as much in two more years?
OP is confusing


OP is not confusing; you are just dense. Stingley is producing a very valuable product, and not getting fairly compensated for it. No matter your opinion on compensation for college athletes, this is indisputable.
Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10521 posts
Posted on 6/1/20 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

So he won’t make as much in two more years?
OP is confusing


This is a terrible, terrible argument.

That's two years where he risks catastrophic injury without being paid. And beyond that, waiting two years is 2 less years of professional football he gets to play. These guys have a limited window for their careers. It isn't like an accountant starting their career 2 years late, where they can work for 40+ years. 2 years to a Pro Football player, even a HOF talent, could be 20% of their playing career. That's roughly 20% less career earnings.

All that being said, Stingley is the 1/1000 type player that could go pro as a freshman and it make sense and be a good decision. It sucks for Stingley, but it's just the way it is and the rule actually makes sense for 99.99% of guys.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram