Started By
Message
locked post

Social distancing and wearing masks

Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:16 pm
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10748 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:16 pm
If you remove the "hospital overload" concern from the equation, is there any value to either of these things, given the latest scientific research?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59410 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:17 pm to
As long as there are air conditioners, we’re in danger.
This post was edited on 4/24/20 at 4:22 pm
Posted by slinger1317
Northshore
Member since Sep 2005
6851 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:18 pm to
I think distancing is more important than masks.

I laugh at the morons in grocery stores etc with their little handkerchief over their mouth. I’m not going to cough on you Boomer.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13487 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:20 pm to
quote:


I laugh at the morons in grocery stores etc with their little handkerchief over their mouth. I’m not going to cough on you Boomer.
You still do not understand that the mask protects others, not you. So, them having that over their face is to protect you if they cough or similar. You sound like someone that just thinks he sounds tough by calling people "boomers."
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:20 pm to
There likely is value to social distancing. With respect to cloth masks, used properly there may be some value, but I don't think there is widespread proper use.
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8748 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:22 pm to
The people wearing masks driving by themselves in their cars are the best. I will not wear a mask. Should stores dictate an individual wear them to enter I will have to comply with the private business but there is no way to enforce us to wear them in public from the government.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
11774 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

With respect to cloth masks, used properly there may be some value, but I don't think there is widespread proper use.



Like the poster before you said, the value is to those around the mask wearer, not the mask wearer themselves.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:23 pm to
What does that have to do with what I said?
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10748 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

There likely is value to social distancing.

What is that value?
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:24 pm to
Reduced spread of a contagious disease.
Posted by WaydownSouth
Stratton Oakmont
Member since Nov 2018
10527 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:25 pm to
Makes the sheep feel safe and protected
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170664 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

What is that value?


Look at New York City where they have essentially the opposite of social distancing

How is that working out for them?
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
11774 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

What does that have to do with what I said?


The improper use is in reference to touching the mask while wearing it. Well that sure makes it less effective for the wearer preventing the virus but it still holds value for the general public because the mask still keeps germs from spreading.

Sooooo wearing masks in public holds value as long as it is over the mouth and nose even if the wearer practices improper personal hygiene skills.
Posted by LSUfanGuy13
Member since Mar 2017
432 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

If you remove the "hospital overload" concern from the equation


You understand that people are dying from this even with proper care, correct?
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Sooooo wearing masks in public holds value as long as it is over the mouth and nose even if the wearer practices improper personal hygiene skills.
Not if the general public is, at a large rate, improperly wearing masks. Any prevention provided by the mask is more than negated by the increased risks of repeated face touchings caused by the mask wearing.
This post was edited on 4/24/20 at 4:38 pm
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
11774 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

I will not wear a mask.


You're such a fricking Rebel.

quote:

Should stores dictate an individual wear them to enter I will have to comply with the private business


Unless there are rules in place cuz while you are a rebel, you don't want risk losing any luxuries in life.

quote:

but there is no way to enforce us to wear them in public from the government.


But frick the government man.... Unless they DO find a way to enforce it and then you will wear a mask cuz you only follow rules if the teacher is watching like a middle schooler.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
53997 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:40 pm to
Can you imagine kids trying to keep masks on all day at school
Even the older kids will struggle.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
11774 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Not if the general public is, at a large rate, improperly wearing masks. Any prevention provided by the mask is more than negated by the increased risks of repeated face touchings caused by the mask wearing.


The repeated face touching puts the mask wearer at further risk. Even if they touch their face and get germs on their hand and then touch something, the germs are only on the thing they touched. If they sneeze or cough, the germs remain contained within the mask (I know its not 100% containment but its much better than nothing). So instead of their cough germs being everywhere (including the air) cuz nothing is covering their mouth and nose, the germs are only on the things they actually touch.

So the masks hold value regardless.
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10748 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Reduced spread of a contagious disease.


That’s what I’ve been assuming as well.

But how does that square with this statement by the Stanford scientist?

quote:

In fact, infected people without severe illness are the immediately available vehicle for establishing widespread immunity. By transmitting the virus to others in the low-risk group who then generate antibodies, they block the network of pathways toward the most vulnerable people, ultimately ending the threat.


Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 4/24/20 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

The repeated face touching puts the mask wearer at further risk.
Correct. Are we not considering that a large percentage of people will be mask wearers? Is the low value of them possible protecting a sneeze or cough not heavily outweighed by increasing face touching by a large factor?

quote:

So the masks hold value regardless.
Not if the wearing of the masks causes more harm than good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram