Started By
Message

re: New SI article claiming more violations for Wade

Posted on 3/29/20 at 3:23 pm to
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8540 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 3:23 pm to
One more time dipshit, they are giving themselves that option without having to litigate over it if it happens. Nowhere is he automatically out based on NOA level 1 or 2. But don’t let facts get in the way.
This post was edited on 3/29/20 at 3:24 pm
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93940 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 3:33 pm to
There's no point in trying to rationalize with that one.
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 6:26 pm to
One more time for you.....
They would NOT have FORCED WW to sign this new contract if they did not FULLY INTEND to FIRE HIS arse when/if LSU receives a "Notice of Infractions" letter from the NCAA. As you said, they could have fired him with the wording in his old contract. However, the BOS wanted to SEND WW (and the fans) A STRONG MESSAGE.
Question for you (since you have a hard time understanding what is really going on)......
If LSU gets a "Notice of Infractions" letter from the NCAA containing Level I or II violations, will WW get fired?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram