- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Girls Do Porn guy is a fugitive now.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 8:34 am to Jorts R Us
Posted on 1/14/20 at 8:34 am to Jorts R Us
Look, I read the article. If the things they are claiming are in fact true, then yes, these guys deserve every bit of justice coming their way.
The problem I am having is the fact that all of their claims require you to take them at their word. If they can prove any of this shite happened, then that's a different conversation.
I stand by my assessment: sounds like buyers remorse.
The problem I am having is the fact that all of their claims require you to take them at their word. If they can prove any of this shite happened, then that's a different conversation.
I stand by my assessment: sounds like buyers remorse.
6
Posted on 1/14/20 at 8:35 am to CptRusty
I checked it out last night. There are a ton of hot women on there. Porn has come a long way.
This post was edited on 1/14/20 at 8:36 am
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:20 am to CptRusty
quote:
The problem I am having is the fact that all of their claims require you to take them at their word. If they can prove any of this shite happened, then that's a different conversation.
Except that's not the case. As an example--These guys paid "reference girls" to legitimize the lies they were spinning about distribution. The texts are out there and corroborate the claims in the court docs.
Again, they went out of their way to deceive among other underhanded tactics and that's why they find themselves in the situation they are in. No one is going after them because some girls are ashamed they did porn.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:25 am to CptRusty
Yeah, the Federal Government tends to have a pretty shitty track record at proving criminal cases. Good point.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 11:45 am to CptRusty
quote:They weren't awarded with $13 mil. because of buyers remorse. If it was that easy to sue porn merchants for simply doing business as usual, it would happen all the time.
I stand by my assessment: sounds like buyers remorse.
Also, people tend not to flee the country when they're innocent.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:26 pm to CptRusty
quote:
Look, I read the article. If the things they are claiming are in fact true, then yes, these guys deserve every bit of justice coming their way.
The problem I am having is the fact that all of their claims require you to take them at their word. If they can prove any of this shite happened, then that's a different conversation.
I stand by my assessment: sounds like buyers remorse.
Oh sure, the feds are going to risk their massively sky high and damn near perfect conviction rate being dented on a case that may have some whores being a little loose with the facts.
Do you even listen to yourself?
The feds don't bring charges against you unless they know 100% beyond a reasonable doubt they have your arse nailed to the wall.
If the feds bring charges against you, you might as well go ahead and get fitted for an orange jumpsuit.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 11:02 am to CptRusty
quote:
If they can prove any of this shite happened, then that's a different conversation.
What do you think defines 'proof'? A judge seems to believe they proved it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News