re: The Girls Do Porn guy is a fugitive now.

They also went on a revenge porn rampage when the girls later objected.

quote:

---

She sent an email to an address she found on the GirlsDoPorn website, but this time she received a response-a cease and desist letter from Panakos Law threatening to seek a restraining order. At this point, Jane Doe I retained Mr. O'Brien, who contacted Mr. Sadock on October 28, 2015 requesting copies of the agreements at issue, which were not produced at that time.

Within days, students, professors, and deans at her law school began receiving calls and emails referencing or containing links to her video. Approximately 60 emails of this type were sent to her law school. When Jane Doe I received a threatening phone call, she began to fear for her safety and so reached out to her dean for assistance and filed a police report. On November 20, 2015, Jane Doe I received a message from someone forwarding her an article about her from TheDirty.com, a popular gossip website, which was also forwarded to her law school. This article, viciously attacked Jane Doe I and, importantly, contained an accusation that she "escorts in Vegas over the summer." This detail led Jane Doe I to believe that the article came from either Garcia or Wolfe, who were the only two people in the room when Garcia encouraged her to say on the video that she was an escort in Vegas.

In or around the end of December 2015, the Court finds that Pratt, disguised as "Ann Fairchild," began reaching out to important people in Jane Doe 1 's life and informing them about the video. He sent an email disclosing the video to the law firm where she was working and to her college soccer coach, as well as a Facebook message to her sister.

Plaintiffs' cyber security expert Charles DeBarber concluded that the probability that the Ann Fairchild account was operated by anyone other than Michael Pratt was "way past lottery odds." He testified that after sending "honeypots" (emails that contain a mechanism that creates an auto-response when opened) to mike@BLL-media.com and to the Ann Fairchild account and receiving responses to both including IP address and VPN information, "there was no other reasonable conclusion but the same person behind that BLL Media [account] was the same as Ann Fairchild." Given that the two "pings" had "the same IP address for that VPN and the same user-agent string [which roughly identifies the type of device] within six minutes," there was no other reasonable conclusion.

---

From the 187 page civil ruling, which details each of the 22 plaintiffs' experiences.

LINK