- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
quid pro quo
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:10 pm
I've rarely heard this before.
We have heard it a lot in recent weeks.
Why have I not been hearing it in the last week?
We have heard it a lot in recent weeks.
Why have I not been hearing it in the last week?
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:14 pm to Redbone
Because it rhymes with Quid Pro Joe!
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:14 pm to Redbone
quote:
I've rarely heard this before.
We have heard it a lot in recent weeks.
Why have I not been hearing it in the last week?
quote:
quid pro quo
Sounds like you are speaking some foreign language or something......
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:14 pm to Redbone
They swapped it out for bribery after a focus group indicated Latin didn't play well with people educated via various American school systems.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:14 pm to Redbone
At this point they are really impeaching based on nothing but OMB
Theyve given up trying to convince us of any legitimate wrongdoing
Theyve given up trying to convince us of any legitimate wrongdoing
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:17 pm to Erin Go Bragh
Probably hard for Asians to pronounce.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:17 pm to Redbone
quote:
Why have I not been hearing it in the last week?
Dems realized they sound like idiots...
Plus after they decided not to include "bribery" in the articles for impeachment, I'm guessing they decided they better stop talking about it.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:18 pm to Redbone
quote:
quid pro quo
Quid pro quo was all the rage (second only to "It's the economy stupid".) when GHWB was running against Clinton.
There is even a book with ole George's picture entitled the Quid Pro Quo.
The Democrats are the most predictable, simple people on the planet. The only thing more predictable is their emotionally driven voter base.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:24 pm to Erin Go Bragh
quote:They overlapped for a while indicating they thought they were 2 different things.
They swapped it out for bribery
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:26 pm to stat19
quote:"emotionally driven voter base" is more dangerous too.
The only thing more predictable is their emotionally driven voter base.
That's the foot soldiers.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:36 pm to Redbone
Well, they started it several weeks ago but then got waaaaaaaaay too confusing for the average dumb arse that votes for these fraud losers... Now they have changed the narrative to "Bribery" and the dumb arse people who vote for these frauds now kind of have an understanding of what the are supposed to be fake outraged at
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:42 pm to Redbone
It is hard to prove quid pro quo when the person allegedly strong armed , says he was not. didn't start the investigation and still received the funding.
Thus they gave up on it. Their lone witness texted there was no quid pro quo only to change his mind during testimony which makes him an easy witness to discredit. Thus they gave up on it.
The 2 articles of impeachment are vague thus they think they can define them anyway they want to say Abuse of Power and Obstruction. Any other charge and they would have to put forth REAL evidence which they don't have.
This whole thing is one big sad joke and the real people who have actually attempted to subvert 2 elections remain uncharged and loved by their base.
I've yet to have a single liberal explain to me how it was fine for the Obama administration to investigate a political opponent, then OUT OF THE NORM, unmask the names of the folks on the calls and release it to 13 agencies.
Only a straight up mental patient or perverse liar can claim this wasn't an attempt to change the outcome of an election.
It is astounding the level of mental gymnastics it takes to impeach a president for allegedly doing EXACTLY what the previous president did.
Oh and in the case of Hunter Biden, do any of you liberals believe he EARNED his money or he got the position and cash for what his daddy did in office?
There is a much more evidence that Hunter got some grade A payola than Trump colluded with Russians. Not even close. How many million was he paid for a position in an industry he had zero work experience?
Thus they gave up on it. Their lone witness texted there was no quid pro quo only to change his mind during testimony which makes him an easy witness to discredit. Thus they gave up on it.
The 2 articles of impeachment are vague thus they think they can define them anyway they want to say Abuse of Power and Obstruction. Any other charge and they would have to put forth REAL evidence which they don't have.
This whole thing is one big sad joke and the real people who have actually attempted to subvert 2 elections remain uncharged and loved by their base.
I've yet to have a single liberal explain to me how it was fine for the Obama administration to investigate a political opponent, then OUT OF THE NORM, unmask the names of the folks on the calls and release it to 13 agencies.
Only a straight up mental patient or perverse liar can claim this wasn't an attempt to change the outcome of an election.
It is astounding the level of mental gymnastics it takes to impeach a president for allegedly doing EXACTLY what the previous president did.
Oh and in the case of Hunter Biden, do any of you liberals believe he EARNED his money or he got the position and cash for what his daddy did in office?
There is a much more evidence that Hunter got some grade A payola than Trump colluded with Russians. Not even close. How many million was he paid for a position in an industry he had zero work experience?
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:54 pm to Redbone
quote:
I've rarely heard this before.
Was polled...
Not strong enough verbiage to move the needle concerning public opinion
Posted on 12/11/19 at 3:06 pm to Redbone
I think the first time I heard it was in the movie "Thirteen Days". A must see movie,imo even though I disagree with some of the facts it's a damn good movie.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 3:32 pm to Redbone
Remember that word "gravitas"? Just like that.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 4:24 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Was polled...
Not strong enough verbiage to move the needle concerning public opinion
We were assured that the House Dems weren't concerned with public sentiment and political ramifications potentially resulting from impeachment.....only concerned with fulfilling Constitutional duties.
Wonder what the civilian focus group was needed for then??
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News