Started By
Message
locked post

No reason to schedule tough games for playoff committee

Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:37 am
Posted by schwartzy
New Orleans
Member since May 2014
9924 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:37 am
Heather Dinich even said that Utah is getting more respect from the committee based on how they are playing against their weaker schedule and their margin of victory in wins. I think that’s bullshite because they lost to USC and may get blown out against the first team they play with a pulse.

Very concerned this committee will drop us to #5 if we lose because they are so erratic with how they rank. It would be a travesty but I wouldn’t put it past them.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
25196 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:42 am to
Agree. Beat Bama, Auburn and Florida each year along with the other cupcakes and you’ll make the playoff.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62000 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:42 am to
quote:

No reason to schedule tough games for playoff committee


It depends who you are.
If you are a school with a pedigree like; Alabama, USC, Notre Dame, no, it really doesn’t pay you to schedule an overtly hard schedule.
With lesser teams, it could mater.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
34706 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:43 am to
Ohio States getting credit for playing Cincinnati at home and we’re getting nothing for going on the road at Austin.

Committee is sending a clear message- play weaker opponents and beat the shite out of them.
Posted by geauxdroddz
Member since Nov 2016
2115 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:52 am to
Exactly right

People just don't understand how bad this is for the game
Posted by jlovel7
NOT Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
23820 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:54 am to
How about they’re fun as shite? I don’t know what I’d do if LSU played a schedule like Clemson’s every year. How could you enjoy that. It’s either win by 30+ every week or feel miserable. That’s how bad the teams they play are. It’d supposed to be fun and playing big teams you don’t normally play is fun.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9128 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:56 am to
quote:

It depends who you are.
If you are a school with a pedigree like; Alabama, USC, Notre Dame, no, it really doesn’t pay you to schedule an overtly hard schedule.
With lesser teams, it could mater.


Exactly. Which is a complete travesty and sham when you really think about it.

Essentially, certain teams get a "pedigree bonus" based on the history of their program. History should be an absolute non-factor when all that should be considered is what teams have done this season.

Yet another pitfall of these decisions being made by a committee of biased human beings.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 6:57 am
Posted by SL Tiger
Houston
Member since May 2007
2298 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:58 am to
ESPN is killing ESPN. Teams will continue to schedule according to what gets them into a playoff. As fans, we won’t see Top 20 matchups. For ESPN, they will have lower ratings during the season. Why play H&H with Texas? Makes no sense for either team.

Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56623 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:59 am to
Why are people just figuring this out in 2019?
Posted by CajunBullet
New Iberia
Member since Sep 2017
2790 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:59 am to
Their bias toward other teams are very obvious no doubt.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19072 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:12 am to
I agree.

BUT... there's a difference between "tough games" and "cupcakes". You can't swing 180 degrees and replace tough with super-easy. You have to stay in the middle ground.

And there's this thing called insurance: if we had lost to UT would we have been at #4 with Bama and their 1 loss to us outside looking in? I think not. Every team not named Bama (and maybe UGA) needs a buffer.

If tOSU had lost to Wisky or another B1G team would they be in Bamas spot? I dunno. They may not need insurance. They might... that's a hypothetical we don't know. With Bama (and UGA) we've seen it before.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:18 am to
quote:


Very concerned this committee will drop us to #5 if we lose



I know many people think we are already a playoff lock. But it think you are right. If we lose Saturday the top 4 will be:

OSU
Clemson
UGA
Utah/Oklahoma/Baylor

Will be all conference champs.

And honestly I don’t have a problem with it. It would really suck but the CCGs should be de facto playoff games.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:20 am to
quote:


How about they’re fun as shite? I don’t know what I’d do if LSU played a schedule like Clemson’s every year. How could you enjoy that. It’s either win by 30+ every week or feel miserable


Hahaha

Have you been in this board before or around LSU fans.

We tend to be miserable and bitch even after big wins.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6401 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:20 am to
There has always been that one team that gets blown out the first round that shouldnt of been in there

2015 - Florida State (lose by 39)
2016 - Michigan State (lose by 38) - and you can argue Oklahoma (lose by 20)
2017 - Ohio State (31)
2018 - Clemson (18) - Was held to 6 points
2019 - Notre Dame (27)

It happens every year and i believe Utah would be that team this year...well id hope it is
Posted by CarlTech
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
413 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:25 am to
The CFP Committee is putting on display the politics of college football. "Eye test", "Traditional Power Team". "Deep Talented Team", "Best Coaches" all are used to justify the bias shown to a handful of teams. Arguing over which l loss team had a worse loss is shallow thinking.

The CFP is one step away from Pro Wrestling.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6401 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:34 am to
i love how when BCS was here there argument was that 3 and 4 are just as good as 1 and 2 that we should go to a playoff system...so everyone was ok with the top 4 teams then why bring in 13 ignorant people choose the top 4 teams and its been a controversy every since...its a power grab
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60731 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:35 am to
Then why is Clemson #3?
Posted by Summer of George
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
6004 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:41 am to
There should not be a committee. It should be the BCS formula picking the top 4. Just use an unbiased formula to pick now and when they expand. It is a power grab.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56860 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:42 am to
quote:

i love how when BCS was here there argument was that 3 and 4 are just as good as 1 and 2 that we should go to a playoff system...so everyone was ok with the top 4 teams then why bring in 13 ignorant people choose the top 4 teams and its been a controversy every since...its a power grab



This. BCS system was fine. Well, they actually could have weighted strength of schedule heavier, but i digress. The implementing of a committee was simply a way to stir up controversy to boost ratings.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94737 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:42 am to
We should schedule all FCS teams for the non-conference schedule. The season ticket holders will bitch about it, but "Just win, baby!" All that work to schedule/beat Texas is for absolutely NOTHING.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram