- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:31 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
There are a few vehicles on here that are contradictions
For example?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:38 pm to Obtuse1
I don’t think it’s bad data, I think it’s simply reinforcement data by the readers that they made the ‘correct’ choice.
I don’t know enough about their ‘studies’ to comment on the scientific validity. I don’t like the publication and it doesn’t ring true to me as a ‘test kitchen’ type of service.
I worked for Underwriters Laboratories out in Santa Clara and there was always beef. Hard to explain, but we tried to make products better by changing build and test Codes and they try with...well sure AF not working through the safety commission. They just seem to talk a lot of shite for a company who changes nothing...but they’re ’all for the consumer’.
Probably out of place when discussing cars...but I’ve regretted every vehicle purchase I made for reliability.
I don’t know enough about their ‘studies’ to comment on the scientific validity. I don’t like the publication and it doesn’t ring true to me as a ‘test kitchen’ type of service.
I worked for Underwriters Laboratories out in Santa Clara and there was always beef. Hard to explain, but we tried to make products better by changing build and test Codes and they try with...well sure AF not working through the safety commission. They just seem to talk a lot of shite for a company who changes nothing...but they’re ’all for the consumer’.
Probably out of place when discussing cars...but I’ve regretted every vehicle purchase I made for reliability.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 4:57 pm to Obtuse1
I've had three Challengers since 2009. Zero issues with any of them.
So the "Dodge sucks for reliability" crowd can go frick themselves
So the "Dodge sucks for reliability" crowd can go frick themselves
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:28 pm to fightin tigers
Appears to be models, not brands.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:34 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Appears to be models, not brands.
As stated numerous times in the thread it is brands, not models. The models shown have CRs lowest and highest predicted reliability for each marque.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:46 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
2020 predicted reliability by brand
Predicted??
So this is just a list of who donated the most to Consumer Reports?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:53 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
Predicted??
So this is just a list of who donated the most to Consumer Reports?
Yes, predicted. You can't talk about actual reliability for a car that hasn't been sold to anyone yet. You have to use past reliability data to predict the reliability of what someone buys tomorrow. It is just like MTBF/AFR for a component.
As for the donation part, you don't understand how CR works, you may be thinking of JD Power and Associates.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:57 pm to Huey Lewis
Porsche is bulletproof.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News