- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Amendment 3-Tax Appeal Jurisdiction
Posted on 10/7/19 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 10/7/19 at 6:12 pm
Can someone please enlighten me on this one. I have no idea what it’s for.
This post was edited on 10/7/19 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 10/7/19 at 6:21 pm to roguetiger15
quote:
PROPOSED CHANGE The proposed amendment would enhance the scope and power of the Board of Tax Appeals and allow the body to rule on whether taxation and fee matters are constitutional under Louisiana or U.S. law. This level of authority is not generally allowed for executive branch agencies. However, the American Bar Association recommends that executive branch tax tribunals should possess at least some limited authority to consider constitutional issues on specific grievances that come before those bodies. Many state tribunals may do so. This amendment would let taxpayers have their entire tax dispute heard in one forum and could expedite resolution. The Board decisions could be appealed to state courts. Taxpayers still would have the option to take their case to the courts instead of the Board of Appeals. The Legislature would be able to pass laws affecting the Board’s jurisdiction and other related matters with a 2/3 vote.
ARGUMENT FOR Taxpayers should be able to seek timely redress for unconstitutional taxes. The Board of Tax Appeals specializes in tax law. Allowing the Board to hear cases involving the constitutionality of tax and fee collections only makes sense. Tax law is complex and experts should review the case first. If either side does not like the decision, they can still appeal to the court system. Following a modernization of the Louisiana tax appeals process in 2014, this change would be another important step toward improving the system to make it fairer and more efficient. It places Louisiana in the mainstream of states that have reformed their tax dispute process. The amendment would reduce delays and costs in deciding tax disputes which is why both business and local government support this change.
ARGUMENT AGAINST Historically, courts have been the only bodies that can decide whether an action or rule complies with the Louisiana or U.S. Constitution. This amendment and its companion act would change that precedent. Unlike judges in the court system, none of the members of the Board of Tax Appeals is elected and they might have less expertise in Louisiana or U.S. constitutional law. Board members might be influenced by the governors who appoint them or the Senators who confirm them. There is no evidence that the current system fails to resolve issues correctly. Constitutional decisions by the Board would be highly likely to be appealed to the courts.
From the PAR guide to the amendments. LINK
Posted on 10/7/19 at 6:28 pm to TigerTattle
What type of dumbass would vote for this? All it is advocating is yet another unnecessary expansion of our state government, adding a redundant entity to perform a function that is already being performed. Pretty much the Louisiana way.
No court or Board full of useless bureaucrats can do anything meaningful about the tax code. Of course the legislature knows this, but any true solution would require them to actually perform their duties....so here we are.
No court or Board full of useless bureaucrats can do anything meaningful about the tax code. Of course the legislature knows this, but any true solution would require them to actually perform their duties....so here we are.
This post was edited on 10/7/19 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 10/7/19 at 6:29 pm to TigerTattle
quote:
The Legislature would be able to pass laws affecting the Board’s jurisdiction and other related matters with a 2/3 vote.
Legislatures shedding their power to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats has never been an issue before! Just look at the federal government!!
Posted on 10/7/19 at 6:56 pm to roguetiger15
It would allow the board of tax appeals - an exec branch agency that is appointed - to make rulings as to certain tax issues being constitutional or not. Their decisions would be appealable to the court system.
I think it would just end up being an additional layer of the legal system. I would imagine close to 100 percent of their constitutional decisions would be appealed to the regular courts.
I think we should instead create a tax court system. Maybe 3-4 judges total, statewide. Have them as an original jurisdiction court on tax issues, where you could take your case to them or to the district court, and appeal from either to the circuit.
I think it would just end up being an additional layer of the legal system. I would imagine close to 100 percent of their constitutional decisions would be appealed to the regular courts.
I think we should instead create a tax court system. Maybe 3-4 judges total, statewide. Have them as an original jurisdiction court on tax issues, where you could take your case to them or to the district court, and appeal from either to the circuit.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:44 am to LSUFanHouston
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 1:02 am
Posted on 10/8/19 at 2:35 am to Indefatigable
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 1:01 am
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:36 am to Indefatigable
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 1:00 am
Posted on 10/8/19 at 8:34 am to Indefatigable
Just, no.
This would be a massive improvement in accurate opinions and much more efficient.
The duplication already exists, this improves that situation.
Now if you don’t like appointed judges that’s one thing (though elected judges are terrible in their own way). But this very much streamlines the bureaucracy.
This would be a massive improvement in accurate opinions and much more efficient.
The duplication already exists, this improves that situation.
Now if you don’t like appointed judges that’s one thing (though elected judges are terrible in their own way). But this very much streamlines the bureaucracy.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 10:16 am to BigJim
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 1:00 am
Posted on 10/8/19 at 10:25 am to Indefatigable
quote:
What type of dumbass would vote for this?
Ones that know about it more than you, apparently.
Thanks, alexbox1, for an actual informed stance.
Popular
Back to top
2






