- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:12 pm to brooksbabino
Then why are you so invested in responding to the post? Is your position that these people never existed, that they didn’t commit suicide or that they weren’t in Clinton circles? Being generous you could probably dismiss 30%, maybe even 50%, but that still leaves a statistical anomaly.
Your claim about who has the burden of proof doesn’t change the fact that your response was an appeal to ridicule, btw. If you want to actually refute claims of fact then it wouldn’t be that difficult. If you’re just going to say “I reject that” over and over then I’m back to my first question. It’s curious that you’d respond at all.
Your claim about who has the burden of proof doesn’t change the fact that your response was an appeal to ridicule, btw. If you want to actually refute claims of fact then it wouldn’t be that difficult. If you’re just going to say “I reject that” over and over then I’m back to my first question. It’s curious that you’d respond at all.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News