Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Charlie Kirk explains the Russia collusion hoax

Posted on 5/26/19 at 7:09 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
65477 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 7:09 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468005 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 7:14 pm to
so at this point, what's the defense? that Mifsud was a Russian agent? otherwise, what's there to defend?
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22070 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

so at this point, what's the defense? that Mifsud was a Russian agent?
Accept he was employed by the CIA.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468005 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Accept he was employed by the CIA.


you just showed the importance of using the proper words
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6830 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

Accept he was employed by the CIA.
I do!
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18940 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 4:36 am to
Remember how the msm totally moved the goalposts on hillary. It was no longer about her illegally using a server or destroying evidence, it was about someone stealing emails.

Well this is no longer about spying. Its the fact the russians gave false intel to steele and hoodwinked him. We got this bad intel and acted on it. Sure we may have planted a few spies and illegal surveillance, but what were we to do, stand idly by and let the Ruskies meddle in our elections??? We erred on the side of safety, democracy, mom and apple pie, now move on.

Heck clapper took it one step further and suggested "the great one" even suggested we defend the republic and look into it. Now NO ONE will dare say "the great one" would ever do anything wrong, to do so would be....racist.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23945 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 6:16 am to
quote:

Its the fact the russians gave false intel to steele and hoodwinked him.


While I agree that will be the new talking points, it will fall flat on its face for anyone with an IQ above single digits.

Neither Steele nor Odumbf*ck's "intelligence" sycophants were hoodwinked. To be hoodwinked you would actually have had to believe the garbage that was in that report. They KNEW it was all false but needed SOMETHING, ANYTHING to have an excuse to justify the fact that they had been spying on the Trump campaign at least since late 2015. Why do you think Brennan, Comey, and Clapper are all now claiming that it was the other two that insisted on using the dossier in the FISA application and that they didn't want any part of it?

We keep hearing NOW that the spying started in late June or early July of 2016. If that's true, then what was the basis of the FISA warrant that was rejected in May 2016?

I believe that Odumbf*ck had orchestrated the spying of Trump (and possibly Cruz and Paul) as soon as they announced their candidacies. But, in order for any of their spying activities to be revealed they would need a warrant. They went to the FISA court in MAY 2016 with a bunch of bullsh!t and the FISA court rejected their warrant -- one of only .1% of warrants ever rejected.

So, they needed something else. Odumbf*ck knew that Bush and the Deep State had hired Steele and that Steele was already trying to find dirt on Trump so they got the DNC and the sHitlary campaign to pay Steele $14 million to pay to Russians. Of course, they couldn't just pay it to Steele directly so they ILLEGALLY LAUNDERED the $14 million first through Perkins Coie and then through Fusion GPS (two Democrat front organizations) to pay Steele $14 million. sHitlary then ILLEGALLY claimed the payments as "attorney's fees" on her campaign finance filings to hide this FELONY.

Remember, sHitlary LIED for over a year claiming that she had no idea of the origins of the Steele dossier. It was only in late 2017 when two Perkins Coie lawyers were subpoenaed by Congress to testify about the origins of the dossier (and told sHitlary that they would not commit perjury for her) that she finally fessed up and admitted that she bought and paid for the fraudulent dossier (why isn't this being looked at for illegal collusion?).

The PRIMARY purpose (although not the sole purpose) of the dossier was to justify spying on the Trump campaign -- something that they had already been doing for over a year by the time they (Odumbf*ck's sycophants) actually finally got the FISA warrants.

What HAS TO BE declassified is the May 2016 FISA application and the October 2016 FISA application. If they only thing that was really added to the October 2016 FISA applications was the dossier, then it's clear that the dossier was bought-and-paid-for by sHitlary simply to give cover to the illegal spying that Odumbf*ck had orchestrated over a year earlier.

Remember ---

This post was edited on 5/27/19 at 6:48 am
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126693 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 6:23 am to
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23945 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 6:29 am to
What Nixon's ratf*ckers did doesn't even compare to what Odumbf*ck did.

Nixon did not know about the attempted spying until they were caught. Nixon should have just let the chips fall where they may and not get involved. But, he did attempt to cover it. At least you can say that he was simply trying to be loyal to his low-level campaign workers.

Odumbf*ck orchestrated the spying and used his hand-picked sycophants at the highest levels of our country's intelligence operations. As the Strzok and Page's emails prove, not to mention the recent public admissions from Brennan, Odumbf*ck knew all about it and was involved from the beginning.

What Nixon did was kindergarten hijinks compared to the TREASONOUS activities of everyone in the CORRUPTED AND FILTHY F*CKING SCUMBAG Odumbf*ck administration.
This post was edited on 5/27/19 at 6:32 am
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126693 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 6:33 am to
I can honestly say, President Nixon was just as paranoid and controlling as President Obama. He just did not have the same capabilities and a fawning media to enable him.
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8565 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 6:39 am to
Tricky Dick was an amateur compared to Jugs!
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23945 posts
Posted on 5/27/19 at 6:41 am to
quote:

President Nixon was just as paranoid and controlling as President Obama.


I would rank them -

1. Odumbf*ck
2. Nixon

Nixon didn't use the FBI/CIA/NSA to spy on the leaders of our allies and members of the press who didn't treat him as their Messiah.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram