- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will the ability to grow fetuses outside of a woman's body end the argument over abortion?
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:09 pm
I would think the medical technology to have a fetus grow outside of a womans body is not too far off, considering everything else they can do with fetuses and childbirth in general
In theory, shouldnt this solve the argument over abortion?
1. the pro-choice argument revolves around women having the choice over their body. Well, this would allow the fetus to be removed from their body
2. the pro-life crowd should be happy the fetus is now able to survive into childhood
What says the OT? Please dont move this to the political board. I would like somewhat neutral discussion.
My opinion is alot of people that hid behind "women should have the right to their body", truly are pro-choice because they dont want the idea of their child walking around this earth weighing on their mind constantly etc etc
In theory, shouldnt this solve the argument over abortion?
1. the pro-choice argument revolves around women having the choice over their body. Well, this would allow the fetus to be removed from their body
2. the pro-life crowd should be happy the fetus is now able to survive into childhood
What says the OT? Please dont move this to the political board. I would like somewhat neutral discussion.
My opinion is alot of people that hid behind "women should have the right to their body", truly are pro-choice because they dont want the idea of their child walking around this earth weighing on their mind constantly etc etc
This post was edited on 5/22/19 at 1:09 pm
23
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:09 pm to lsupride87
Sounds gross
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:10 pm to lsupride87
It would be funny to watch pro abortion people immediately start calling it a baby if it's growing outside the womb and they don't have to abort it.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:11 pm to lsupride87
libs are the children of Satan. Satan is all about killing and destroying. Satan will continue killing and using libs to do it.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:12 pm to lsupride87
Removing the baby is an "Undue burden to the mother" would be the arguement.
The problem would truly be that Roe v Wade discusses viability outside the womb.
If a baby could be created and brought to term completely independent of a human womb, that's a legal game changer.
It's also why RvW is in trouble because as pre-natal technology has gotten better with premature births, its lowered the threshold for viability.
The problem would truly be that Roe v Wade discusses viability outside the womb.
If a baby could be created and brought to term completely independent of a human womb, that's a legal game changer.
It's also why RvW is in trouble because as pre-natal technology has gotten better with premature births, its lowered the threshold for viability.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:12 pm to lsupride87
The plural of fungus is fungi. Why isn't the plural of fetus feti?
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:13 pm to lsupride87
I'm very interested in seeing the multitude of directions this thread can go
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:13 pm to TH03
quote:Yeh. I am on the fence about the entire abortion thing, because I do get the "its my body thing" slightly
It would be funny to watch pro abortion people immediately start calling it a baby if it's growing outside the womb and they don't have to abort it.
I just feel alot of people that are pro-choice arent so much about the womans choice, and they really just dont want the added weight/guilt of knowing they have a child in the world they arent taking care of
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:15 pm to lsupride87
If only the people that would choose to kill their unborn children have abortions, why would the rest of us want to stop them ?
40 years are so and the issue resolved itself
40 years are so and the issue resolved itself
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:18 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:Yep. And we arent far off. The hospital I work for is already transplanting the uterus from mothers to daughters.
Removing the baby is an "Undue burden to the mother" would be the arguement.
The problem would truly be that Roe v Wade discusses viability outside the womb.
If a baby could be created and brought to term completely independent of a human womb, that's a legal game changer.
Meaning, a 26 year daughter isnt able to carry the child do to their uterus being unstable. The daughter than gets her mother to transplant her uterus to her
So now, the daughter can get pregnant. So check this trippiness out. Now the 26 year old daughter, and the baby she is carrying were grown in the same uterus
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:27 pm to lsupride87
I've always liked this strategy. I think it would be incredibly difficult to extract the fertilized embryo from the mother without killing the embryo, though.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:29 pm to lsupride87
Research how abortions are done and you'll realize that the "procedure" they follow today will change to that of a c-section. Cost will skyrocket and then you'll have an issue with where to keep the babies during their growth as well as after birth.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:32 pm to lsupride87
Similar to the “fetal viability” argument used by abortionist in the 80s. fricking science.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:32 pm to Spelt it rong
quote:Ofcourse. But that kind of goes back to my entire thought process
you'll have an issue with where to keep the babies during their growth as well as after birth.
How much of abortion is truly about the womans body and her right? It feels to me more about "what the frick are we going to do with these kids?"
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:35 pm to arcalades
quote:
Satan
Isn't real
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:35 pm to lsupride87
quote:
How much of abortion is truly about the womans body and her right? It feels to me more about "what the frick are we going to do with these kids?"
Can't say, since I'm not a woman.
I do wish that adoption were more feasible though. I have a couple friends who just adopted a little boy and it was >$30k.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:49 pm to lsupride87
Would it still be their responsibility?
If not, who’s gonna care for it?
If not, who’s gonna care for it?
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:55 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
The problem would truly be that Roe v Wade discusses viability outside the womb.
Does it? Honest question, I am uncertain. I do know that in his majority opinion, Justice Harry Blackmun notes, “If this suggestion of personhood is established, [Roe’s] case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment.”
That is the real conundrum here. And then it becomes how do we charge someone with murder, negligent homicide, infanticide or whatever when an unborn child is spontaneously aborted due to the actions of another like a drunk driver or an armed assailant or someone who kicks a pregnant woman in the abdomen.
We have a legal split personality here.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:56 pm to mindbreaker
quote:quote:
Satan
Isn't real
Exactly what a spawn of Satan would say to protect pops.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:56 pm to lsupride87
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News