- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man who impregnated 10-year-old says he doesn't deserve the 160 year sentence
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:13 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:13 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Actually, your world view has been crafted by others. Based on a book it only loosely follows now.
1
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:17 am to TH03
quote:
Darth, you gonna volunteer to raise the kid? Because the 10 year old can't. We just gonna throw the innocent baby into foster care and hope for the best?
No, he will just stay up on his “morally superior” high horse and judge people based on his own personal self absorbed feels.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:19 am to tigerpimpbot
Notice he never responded to the question.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:19 am to Darth_Vader
If my wife ever gives me any shite, I'll just kill her. Same for my kids. The bible straight up says I can. (/ns)
You know in the SAME chapter(book) where it says "man shall not lay with man"
Funny how you Christians cherry pick your book.
You know in the SAME chapter(book) where it says "man shall not lay with man"
Funny how you Christians cherry pick your book.
This post was edited on 5/20/19 at 9:20 am
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:22 am to TH03
I left out should.
You should only get credit for one child. Too many do use children and others children for taxes.
You should only get credit for one child. Too many do use children and others children for taxes.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:23 am to Napoleon
quote:Well I’d prefer not to have the state pay for and raise the child. Mostly because I think the state does a terrible job at that sort of thing and the baby would be better off being raised by responsible loving parents who choose to adopt or by a charitable foster home. But if the state paying for and raising the child is the only alternative to killing the baby the sure, I’m on bord.
Then the state should provide for victims of rape. Pay for the baby's care until it is 18. That seems fair, since the state can force you to carry a rape baby.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:25 am to mahdragonz
I'm pro life but not in cases of rape or if the mother has her life threatened. I quantify this as such.
No life should be considered more valuable than another in the eyes of the law.
So an abortion that could lead to such psychological damage as a rape case, I can support it because the women did not choose to have sex, and she should not be forced to deal with the repercussions of another persons crime.
If the mother can die, it is not up to anyone to say her life is less valuable than the kids. So it is her choice.
If incest and both parties wanted the act and are above age, I believe in killing the whole family...they don't need to exist either way.
Other cases..if you choose to have sex and a life forms because of this action, killing that creation is pure evil.
No life should be considered more valuable than another in the eyes of the law.
So an abortion that could lead to such psychological damage as a rape case, I can support it because the women did not choose to have sex, and she should not be forced to deal with the repercussions of another persons crime.
If the mother can die, it is not up to anyone to say her life is less valuable than the kids. So it is her choice.
If incest and both parties wanted the act and are above age, I believe in killing the whole family...they don't need to exist either way.
Other cases..if you choose to have sex and a life forms because of this action, killing that creation is pure evil.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:26 am to Napoleon
quote:I am not a religious man. My worldviews are centered around what I believe makes a moral, just and civilized society that works to benefit society as whole and all of its members, not one that caters to the mythical notions of equality and fairness.
Actually, your world view has been crafted by others. Based on a book it only loosely follows now.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:30 am to MrLSU
Slow torture with a couple medical professionals in the room to revive him when he passes out from the pain. This would be a good start.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:30 am to tigerpimpbot
quote:Oh so it’s a mercy killing now?
We just gonna throw the innocent baby into foster care and hope for the best?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:34 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Oh so it’s a mercy killing now?
No. I'm simply asking a man on his soapbox how the child will be cared for after we've forced a 10 year old rape victim to carry him/her to term and give birth.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:35 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Do How do you determine when life begins?
Is it at conception?
Heartbeat?
Viability?
Or birth?
Is it at conception?
Heartbeat?
Viability?
Or birth?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:36 am to TH03
quote:
No. I'm simply asking a man on his soapbox how the child will be cared for after we've forced a 10 year old rape victim to carry him/her to term and give birth.
None of them give a shite about the child once it's born
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:36 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Having a full term pregnancy would be a death sentence for many 10 year old girls. Their bodies are not capable of the physical changes. So you would be entirely ok if a man raped your 10 year old daughter and she was crying not to have a baby...you would force her to go through with it? You would force her to endure a pregnancy against her will since she was impregnated against her will?
Oh. So you’re saying it’s a legitimate, significant health risk to the mother (in this case, a ten-year-old-child). So the abortion in this case would fall under that, not under a rape exception. Recognize that and I doubt many people will have a problem with it.
Problem solved. And then we deal with the psychopath and pedophile.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:54 am to Marco Esquandolas
Ruin two lives instead of one.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:57 am to MrLSU
He is right 160 years is a bad sentence. Do I hear support for 320 years?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:58 am to MrLSU
quote:
he doesn't deserve the 160 year sentence
I agree. 100 years is plenty long enough.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 10:04 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Is Mohammed his role model?
Which one of you a-holes downvoted this?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 10:06 am to Napoleon
quote:
Do How do you determine when life begins?
Is it at conception?
Heartbeat?
Viability?
Or birth?
We're never going to have a clearly defined answer to that question so abortion will always be a controversy.
This post was edited on 5/20/19 at 10:07 am
Posted on 5/20/19 at 10:07 am to Tiguar
quote:
It's a black baby, so liberals should be extra happy to abort it.
Actually Liberals/Democrats benefit either way: If it's aborted, the Left make bank....if it grows up, it will probably be fatherless, angry, poor and easy for Democrats to enslave and manipulate for votes......it's a win/win!!!
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News