re: 2019 Kentucky Derby

I tried to find this again to link it but had no luck, but I read an article this morning that said that there have been similar instances to what Maximum Security did in the race yesterday in past Derby's and that things like this happen in nearly all Kentucky Derby races. The article even had examples from past years. Rarely do you have protests though because it's understood that it's going to happen due to the larger than normal field of horses and things like crowd noise, etc. It's almost unavoidable. And when there have been inquiries/protests (ie. Monarchos) it's never upheld. This is why I think the "nothing happened to the horses" argument is valid for the Kentucky Derby. This isn't some maiden or allowance race at the Fairgrounds. It's the Kentucky Derby. There should be different rules because there is no race like this one. Unless it's egregious there shouldn't be a DQ for "impeding another horse" as what was claimed against Maximum Security. How do you not impede another horse in a race this size? Nobody was beating Maximum Security yesterday. Also, like I said earlier, if Maximum Security was trained by someone like Bob Baffert or Todd Pletcher rather than Jason Servis there probably would have been no DQ.