- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mueller Day In Game Thread
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:33 pm to WonderWartHawg
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:33 pm to WonderWartHawg
quote:
'it doesn't exonerate him.' Highlighting it, saying it over and over...
Isn't that kind of important?
Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:35 pm to VOR
quote:
'it doesn't exonerate him.' Highlighting it, saying it over and over...
Isn't that kind of important?
Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question
No collusion
No Obstruction
A lot of butt hurt
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:42 pm to WeeWee
Yuengling and Sam Adams 76 gbaadt
Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:03 pm to Possumslayer
Who was the guy on the left of Barr in the PC?
Rosenstein looked drugged.
Rosenstein looked drugged.
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:16 pm to VOR
quote:
VOR
quote:He wasn't charged or charges suggested by a group of people assigned to find enough to get him impeached.
Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question
What part of there is no there there do you stupid libtards not understand? Your own fellow Trump hater that said it.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 2:11 am to VOR
quote:
'it doesn't exonerate him.' Highlighting it, saying it over and over...
quote:
Isn't that kind of important?
quote:
Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question
The basis of our justice system is that people have to be proven guilty there is no need to be proven innocent or "exonerated". It is binary, you either committed a criminal act or you didn't.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 2:12 am to Lsujacket66
quote:
Today should be fun
It was.
The Low T squad didn’t disappoint.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 9:37 am to EA6B
quote:
The basis of our justice system is that people have to be proven guilty
I did find it interesting that the definitions/ideals/requirements were changed/altered for the report so that his failure to be deposed is somehow tantamount to obstruction...
Posted on 4/19/19 at 10:04 am to VOR
quote:
'it doesn't exonerate him.' Highlighting it, saying it over and over...
Isn't that kind of important?
good thing the concept of being "proven innocent" is something our country grew out of a couple of hundred years ago, otherwise you might go to prison for all of that kiddy porn you download.
What's that you say? You don't do such things? Prove it.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 8:51 pm to VOR
quote:
Isn't that kind of important? Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question
I agree. I’ve read the pertinent parts of the report. Barr is full of shite and acting like a lackey hack. There was no conspiracy, but there’s no fricking way a rational person can conclude that there was “no collusion”. And on top of that, there is probable obstruction, which Mueller lays out quite succinctly. It’s more than obvious that Muller intended congress to take action on multiple fronts, including obstruction. Trump said he’s fricked. And he is. Now it just depends on how everybody handles it. If he’s impeached, then Pence would just pardon him. frick that noise. I want this fricker to rot in prison. I don’t want him impeached. I want to beat him at the ballot box and watch him perp-walked away from everything.
However, even if he is impeached and pardoned for federal crimes, the SDNY is there to take care of business later. So, I’m torn.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 8:54 pm to thetigerman
quote:
there is probable obstruction
quote:
Trump said he’s fricked
You forgot the rest of the statement. Ignorance or dishonesty on Your part?
quote:
the SDNY is there to take care of business later.
I bet you don’t even know what the allegations in the SDNY investigation are
Keep dreaming. It’s going to be a tough 6 years for you.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 9:17 pm to LosLobos111
I DGAF what you think, Trumpist.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 9:18 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
BBONDS25
You’re supposed to be a lawyer. So stop being a fricking partisan hack. All you want to do is mince words and dissect semantics. You’re just as compromised as Barr is. GTFO.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 4/19/19 at 9:25 pm to thetigerman
quote:That's special. Yes, I read your partisan melt.
So stop being a fricking partisan hack
Posted on 4/19/19 at 9:28 pm to Diamondawg
GFY
Rebut, or go the frick away.
Rebut, or go the frick away.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 4/19/19 at 9:52 pm to thetigerman
quote:
You’re supposed to be a lawyer. So stop being a fricking partisan hack. All you want to do is mince words and dissect semantics.
If by semantics you mean applying specific acts to elements of a crime, yes. That is the discussion I want. It is quite telling you neither provided any specifics, nor are willing to discuss them.
quote:
You’re just as compromised as Barr is
Are you saying Barr is basically Trump’s wingman?
Oh and I noticed you didn’t rebut my allegation that you are ignorant as to what the SDNY is investigating. Yet you assert they will gain a conviction. Perhaps you aren’t the right person to be calling anyone partisan. Hack.
quote:
Rebut, or go the frick away.
Your lack of self awareness is staggering
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 4/19/19 at 10:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Your lack of self awareness is staggering
Such as is your lack of observance and objectivity. I find your opinions lack regard and are unworthy of response given your allegiance. Good day, sir.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 10:05 pm to thetigerman
quote:
Such as is your lack of observance and objectivity. I find your opinions lack regard and are unworthy of response given your allegiance. Good day, sir.
Still waiting on a single specific so we can engage in an objective discussion. You either aren’t capable or are unwilling. Your projection is pathetically obvious.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 10:12 pm to BBONDS25
Read the fricking report, HACK. Because that’s what you are, a fricking HACK posing as a lawyer. It’s a disgrace that you represent people legally.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 10:45 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News