Started By
Message

re: Would you vote for a candidate who ran on a “major cutbacks to lower deficit” platform?

Posted on 3/7/19 at 5:50 am to
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7855 posts
Posted on 3/7/19 at 5:50 am to
I would vote for.

There actually is a point, where $20 trillion fades into $28T or $33T or $41T.. where it crashes bad for us.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 3/7/19 at 5:52 am to
quote:

There actually is a point, where $20 trillion fades into $28T or $33T or $41T.. where it crashes bad for us.


We’re there now.
10% of the money taken in by the fed goes for paying just the interest on the national debt.

Without major change, we’re about to be steamrolled.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
3323 posts
Posted on 3/7/19 at 8:13 am to
quote:

There actually is a point, where $20 trillion fades into $28T or $33T or $41T.. where it crashes bad for us.


While I agree philosophically, is it fair to ask if this is a true statement?

I have been hearing this for 40 years, and I have not been inconvenienced or had to modify my life in any way.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram