Started By
Message

re: Tomorrow is a huge day. SCOTUS will meet on the Census question

Posted on 2/15/19 at 1:45 am to
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13542 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 1:45 am to
quote:

If the Census determines the representation of each state, why would foreigners be included? If a state is over represented because of foreigners, doesn't it diminish the voice of ACTUAL Americans in their own representative government?


It seems to make common sense, however, those opposed claim "they have a leg to stand on" regarding the original wording of congress regarding the census. It states "the counting of all people" not just citizens.

Its ironic if you think about it. The founding fathers worded it that way so they could keep tabs on where non citizen slaves lived, now the liberals are using the wording to prevent the govt from keeping tabs on where non citizens live (and getting more fed funding and representation in congress to boot).
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68256 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 2:01 am to
quote:

the counting of all people" not just citizens. 




I don't know why we use this expensive and old-fashioned method anymore when social security already has the data to make a count.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42857 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 4:25 am to
quote:

those opposed claim "they have a leg to stand on" regarding the original wording of congress regarding the census. It states "the counting of all people" not just citizens.


The is a patently absurd argument.


The census is still going to count 'all the people' - it is merely wanting more information about 'the people' - like whether or not they are citizens.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21968 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 6:01 am to
quote:

It seems to make common sense, however, those opposed claim "they have a leg to stand on" regarding the original wording of congress regarding the census. It states "the counting of all people" not just citizens.

Its ironic if you think about it. The founding fathers worded it that way so they could keep tabs on where non citizen slaves lived, now the liberals are using the wording to prevent the govt from keeping tabs on where non citizens live (and getting more fed funding and representation in congress to boot).





The first time around the democrats got only 3/5th of a person for their slaves, now they are insisting on 5/5ths.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram