Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Border right of way . So now the owners of border land are waffling against the wall

Posted on 2/14/19 at 9:49 pm
Posted by Lago Gato
Member since Dec 2018
2037 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 9:49 pm
The Feds shouldn’t need much for a road and wall It’s all about photo ops . They have zero skills other than holding signs and chanting.where is the money coming from. To ship them from the interior of hust
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112731 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 9:53 pm to
I believe there is already a servitude/right of way for the wall per a statute from either the 40s or 50s.
Posted by umop_apisdn
Member since Sep 2017
3673 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 9:55 pm to
right on
Posted by Lago Gato
Member since Dec 2018
2037 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 9:57 pm to
Sorry guys , I’m so pissed that these people are shipped here with very little trades . The majority of the professionals that I work with have sacrificed to be legal given status of. Our schools are over burdened and the hospitals are overcrowded. The country is being taken over without a shot fired
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25195 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 10:00 pm to
Then build the wall where those property owners are outside of the wall
Posted by TimeOutdoors
LA
Member since Sep 2014
13122 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 10:01 pm to
Their way of receiving more money.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37153 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 10:04 pm to
How can the border land owners waffle on eminent domain?
Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 10:31 pm to
There is a 60 foot easement from El Paso to San Diego.

No landowners on that stretch have a case.

The only place they could bitch is on the Rio Grande from El Paso to Brownsville.

Most will be cool, there will be a few who protest. It will be entertaining to see the left all of a sudden defend the Bundy types.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 10:50 pm to
The government will just take the land. The government took our land after Katrina for levees so I see no reason why they cant take their land for a wall.
Posted by TexasTiger13
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2014
500 posts
Posted on 2/14/19 at 11:57 pm to
Does a homeowner have a right to force the US government to replace their beach after erosion if they own beachfront property? Seems to me the government owns the border and if the government wants a wall to protect the country then they get a wall. They may have to pay for the land to build the wall but the border belongs to the government. Just my opinion.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 12:04 am to
quote:

They may have to pay for the land


Nope
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
46437 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 1:26 am to
quote:

They may have to pay for the land to build the wall
There it is. That's probably what all of this is about. More money.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 1:47 am to
According to this the easement does in fact go from the Gulf to the Pacific.

By the President of the United States of America.
A PROCLAMATION.

Whereas, it is necessary for the public welfare that a strip of land lying along the boundary line between the United States and the Republic of Mexico be reserved from the operation of the public land laws and kept free from obstruction as a protection against the smuggling of goods between the United States and said Republic;

Now, therefore, I, Theodore Roosevelt, President of the United States, do hereby declare, proclaim and make known that there are hereby reserved from entry, settlement or other form of appropriation under the public land laws and set apart as a public reservation, all public lands within sixty feet of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico, within the State of California and the Territories of Arizona and New Mexico; and where any river or stream forms any part of said international boundary line, this reservation shall be construed and taken as extending to and including all public lands belonging to the United States which lie within sixty feet of the margin of such river or stream.

Excepting from the force and effect of this proclamation all lands which are at this date embraced in any level entry or covered by any lawful filing, selection or rights of way duly of record in the proper United States Land Office, or upon which any valid settlement has been made pursuant to law, an the statutory period within which to make entry or filing of record has not expired; and also excepting all lands which at this date are embraced within any withdrawal or reservation for any use or purpose to which this reservation for customs purposes is repugnant; Provided, that these exceptions shall not continue to apply to any particular tract of land unless the entryman, settler or claimant continues to comply with the law under which the entry, filing or settlement was made, or unless the reservation or withdrawal to which this reservation is inconsistent continues in force; Provided Further, that the said strips, tracts, or parcels of land, reserved as aforesaid, may be used for public highways but for no other purpose whatever, so long as the reservation of same under this proclamation shall continue in force.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my band and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the City of Washington this 27th day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seven, and of the Independence of the United States the one hundred and thirty-first.

Signature of Theodore Roosevelt
Theodore Roosevelt
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 1:56 am to
You or your family received no compensation for property you owned that was taken by eminent domain to build or expand a lever?
I thought landowners were entitled to fair market value, although there are frequent arguments about FMV.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 1:57 am to
quote:

Does a homeowner have a right to force the US government to replace their beach after erosion if they own beachfront property?


The beach ain’t the border.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 2:00 am to
Huh. That seems to apply only to new patents. Almost all of the border was privately owned before this, I’d bet.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 5:44 am to
Got nothing
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram