re: Declaring national emergency is a bad move

quote:

---

Y’all keep on saying bad precedent but since 76 over 58 nat emergencies have been declared

---

Take a look at what they involve:

Iran, nuclear weapons, Palestine, Colombian narcos, Sudan, the Balkans, Zimbabwe, post-9/11 action, Belarus, Congo, North Korea, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Crimea, Chinese cyber-attacks, Nicaragua.

Essentially zero of that is relevant to domestic policy.

This is a shite precedent, and it's the kind of thing that will come back to bite conservatives in the arse. And to think we all (rightfully) complained about Obama's abuse of EO's.

Can't wait for the national emergency on gun control or climate change.

quote:

---

Y’all keep on saying bad precedent but since 76 over 58 nat emergencies have been declared

---

are they hurricanes?

where is the list? would be interested to see it

quote:

---

Y’all keep on saying bad precedent but since 76 over 58 nat emergencies have been declared

---

31 of them are still ongoing!!

31 declared national emergencies still in effect

Medicated Nancy sounds like she's never heard of this ever being done before.


As for her making the threat regarding guns, that only confirms what most of us already know: The Democratic Party ultimately wants to disarm the American people. She outed them once and for all on that, yesterday.