re: A Scientific dissent from Darwin

quote:

---

Come on Rob, just look at this thread and anyone who even questions the thought that things could have been intelligently designed are called all sorts of demeaning names. So, to me, that means that the studying of it is nominal and those who dissent are cast from the fold. And I thought the whole premise of science is asking question and testing theories against what is actually known.

---

Because you're intellectually dishonest or are too stupid to realize you're being intellectually dishonest. Yall do not follow the scientific method. The anti-evolution argument is about as sloppy as a hooker's pussy at the end of her shift.

quote:

---

Come on Rob, just look at this thread and anyone who even questions the thought that things could have been intelligently designed are called all sorts of demeaning names.

---

For a very long time, Newton's view of Gravity was fully accepted. But people KEPT ON studying it and, along came Einstein to upend the entire view of HOW Gravity occurs but, that gravity existed didn't go up in smoke.

Saying we think we know EXACTLY how it happened is silly but using that to deny THAT it happened is equally silly.

quote:

---

And I thought the whole premise of science is asking question and testing theories against what is actually known.

---

Which is why exactly that continues to be done. I mean, it's not like Evolutionary science has no one left working in it. And, they aren't all simply standing in front of Creationists saying "nuh uh".

They are like, amazingly, STUDYING it!