Started By
Message

re: Where would you rather be in an apocalyptic situation?

Posted on 1/3/19 at 10:28 pm to
Posted by Tigerdew
The Garden District of Da' Parish
Member since Dec 2003
13594 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 10:28 pm to
The country to survive the initial wave but you’re going to have to venture into the city eventually for supplies or whatever.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26946 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 10:30 pm to
Being isolated seems more dangerous for attackers
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 1/4/19 at 6:00 am to
quote:

The country to survive the initial wave but you’re going to have to venture into the city eventually for supplies or whatever.


In an apocalyptic situation, it will take maybe 3 days for supplies to run out, and those will be fought over by panic-stricken herds of dumbasses. After that, there won't be any re-supply in the cities.

I'd much rather take my chances away from any city.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/4/19 at 9:05 am to
quote:

The country to survive the initial wave but you’re going to have to venture into the city eventually for supplies or whatever.


This.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram