- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Two questions for pro-choice posters
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:10 am
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:10 am
1. If NASA announced today that they’d discovered live bacteria on Mars, would you consider that this proves there is life on Mars?
2. If you answered yes to question 1, please explain to me that how a single cell bacteria on Mars is considered to be a life while an unborn fetus (which is very much multi-cell and even has a heart beat) on Earth is not also alive.
I’ll wait.
2. If you answered yes to question 1, please explain to me that how a single cell bacteria on Mars is considered to be a life while an unborn fetus (which is very much multi-cell and even has a heart beat) on Earth is not also alive.
I’ll wait.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:12 am to Darth_Vader
Because the bacteria might register to vote democrat.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:13 am to Darth_Vader
Science is only a selective argument in "Climate Change". When talking Gender Identity or Pro Choice, you are just being a misogynistic pig if you bring up science
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:13 am to Darth_Vader
Their most common answer...


This post was edited on 11/30/18 at 7:14 am
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:14 am to Darth_Vader
Why do abortion opponents repeatedly ask the same stupid-arsed questions, which intentionally attempt to misrepresent the views of abortion rights supporters regarding the status of a zygote/blastocyst/embryo/fetus?
This post was edited on 11/30/18 at 7:16 am
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:16 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
pro- baby killers
I hate the word choice.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:17 am to AggieHank86
Answer the question please? I’ll even simplify it for you.
Why do you consider a bacteria to be life but you don’t consider an unborn baby to be life?
It’s not a complicated question. Again, I’ll wait.
Why do you consider a bacteria to be life but you don’t consider an unborn baby to be life?
It’s not a complicated question. Again, I’ll wait.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:17 am to Darth_Vader
If pro life means protection for all life forms, including bacteria on Mars, this argument will end in about a week to ten days.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:18 am to Darth_Vader
I'm pro life btw.
I dont I've ever heard one say a fetus isnt life. They say it isnt human life or parasitic life.
I dont I've ever heard one say a fetus isnt life. They say it isnt human life or parasitic life.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:21 am to Darth_Vader
quote:It has been answered on this forum 100 times, and you ignored the answer all 100 of them. Why would the 101st be any different?
Answer the question please?
Few abortion rights supporters say that a zygote/blastocyst/embryo/fetus (ZBEF) is not “life” in a biological sense. I certainly do not.
Enjoy your circle jerk.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:21 am to Darth_Vader
A thing has one of two states of being: It is either alive or it is not.
Unless you believe in vampires, it is simply a fact.
A fetus is alive at every stage of growth.
The abortion debate will never be an honest one because regardless of ones' opinion, abortion is the ending of LIFE.
Now, I'm a Pro-Life Conservative, but if I were suddenly king of the world, I would not make all abortions illegal.
I would however most certainly make late-term abortions illegal.
My stance may not make sense, but as a human being, that's my right.
As is the case with every human on the planet, I'm hypocritical about some things.
Unless you believe in vampires, it is simply a fact.
A fetus is alive at every stage of growth.
The abortion debate will never be an honest one because regardless of ones' opinion, abortion is the ending of LIFE.
Now, I'm a Pro-Life Conservative, but if I were suddenly king of the world, I would not make all abortions illegal.
I would however most certainly make late-term abortions illegal.
My stance may not make sense, but as a human being, that's my right.
As is the case with every human on the planet, I'm hypocritical about some things.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:24 am to Darth_Vader
What a dumb thread idea. 
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:25 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
1. If NASA announced today that they’d discovered live bacteria on Mars, would you consider that this proves there is life on Mars?
2. If you answered yes to question 1, please explain to me that how a single cell bacteria on Mars is considered to be a life while an unborn fetus (which is very much multi-cell and even has a heart beat) on Earth is not also alive.
I’ll wait.
Life =/= human being with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
By your logic, would you say a sperm cell is alive? And before you spaz out and start discussing more criteria remember you didnt mention any of those criteria in your poorly thought out first post.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:26 am to Darth_Vader
2 things (minimum) wrong with your "equivalence"
1) These bacteria are living independent of a "host" and fully formed / life sustaining
2) If they found a blob of fat cells, I'd say they found evidence of life - yet, I'd still be pro-liposuction choice. If they found an appendix, I'd say "life" has been proven - but, I'd allow medically necessary appendectomies.
I've said before that I am uncomfortably pro-choice. I just don't see how your scenario meets the concept discussed within my discomfort.
1) These bacteria are living independent of a "host" and fully formed / life sustaining
2) If they found a blob of fat cells, I'd say they found evidence of life - yet, I'd still be pro-liposuction choice. If they found an appendix, I'd say "life" has been proven - but, I'd allow medically necessary appendectomies.
I've said before that I am uncomfortably pro-choice. I just don't see how your scenario meets the concept discussed within my discomfort.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:27 am to Darth_Vader
What I don’t get is why do you care?
I mean really, you gonna come take care of that baby?
I mean really, you gonna come take care of that baby?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:29 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
2. If you answered yes to question 1, please explain to me that how a single cell bacteria on Mars is considered to be a life while an unborn fetus (which is very much multi-cell and even has a heart beat) on Earth is not also alive
I don't argue that an unborn fetus isn't alive.
The question is the cutoff between what's considered the mother's body and choices vs. an independent human being.
It's not an easy answer I know, but I think the mother should have some sort of choice to abort in the early stages.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:30 am to Nastradamus
quote:
What I don’t get is why do you care?
I mean really, you gonna come take care of that baby?
That question could be asked of almost anything. Sick old people? You dont care about them unless you're willing to take them all in and care for them.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 7:30 am to Darth_Vader
Waiting for "not in my planet".
Pro abortionists want control; which means that they have no self-control and want something or someone to blame for their mistaken behavioral choices, leading to their self proclaimed title of "pro-choice".
Pro abortionists want control; which means that they have no self-control and want something or someone to blame for their mistaken behavioral choices, leading to their self proclaimed title of "pro-choice".
Popular
Back to top


49







