- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Was there still civil war resentment in the early 1900s
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:30 pm
I guess some could say there still is, but how long did it take to become a united nation again. I can’t imagine all confederates were over it after a few years.
Also, they have some cool videos on YouTube of civil war veterans chatting it up.
Also, they have some cool videos on YouTube of civil war veterans chatting it up.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:31 pm to cheesesteak501
The way some people talk, there is still resentment now.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:35 pm to cheesesteak501
Things like that have what I call half life. I think it is generational. So probably all the people of the south hated the north during the war.
Then the next generation 50% of the people hated them then the next generation 25% of the people have resentment. The next 12.5% and so on.
Then the next generation 50% of the people hated them then the next generation 25% of the people have resentment. The next 12.5% and so on.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:36 pm to cheesesteak501
Yes. I’ve even heard stories of states incorporating the confederate flag into their state flag.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:37 pm to cheesesteak501
bro, do you even OT?
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:38 pm to cheesesteak501
The US Army had real trouble recruiting in the south.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:41 pm to cheesesteak501
Most of the people who lived through it, either as participant or noncombatant, didn't mythologize the war. That came with the next generation. Most of the monuments that are so controversial nowadays went up between 1890-1920.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 2:42 pm to Lsuhack1
It seems like the South resisted cultural, industrial and educational change during and after Reconstruction. And there remains a divide between. North and South in many ways.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:08 pm to cheesesteak501
Study up on Reconstruction Period. That’s all you need to know.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:12 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Most of the people who lived through it, either as participant or noncombatant, didn't mythologize the war.
The participants almost immediately after the War formed associations such as the United Confederate Veterans and the Grand Army of the Republic, and there were, on occasions, joint gatherings of the two groups.
quote:
Most of the monuments that are so controversial nowadays went up between 1890-1920.
Funereal monuments in the region appeared almost immediately after Appomattox and honored individual or community war dead. They appeared in cemeteries or other community gathering places, generally retained a highly sectional tone, and ranged in size from small cenotaphs to elaborate and highly artistic tributes. Maryland’s first such marker, erected in 1866,
A second partisan theme, emerging first in the late 1860s, commemorated the sacrifice of survivors, including veterans’ monuments on town squares, regimental monuments on battlefields, and tributes to Northern or Southern women. The most active period for the dedication of unit memorials at Gettysburg fell between 1885 and 1895; monumentation at Antietam saw its greatest activity in the period from 1900 to 1910. Battlefield monuments ranged from grand state monuments to understated regimental markers representing honors extended by individual counties or towns.
Remembrance and Reconciliation
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:18 pm to cheesesteak501
Yes, the Daughters of the Confederacy were huge around that time and very politically active in spreading positive propaganda about the Confederates, trying to romanticize the confederacy as some noble cause. And they largely succeeded.
This post was edited on 11/11/18 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:22 pm to cheesesteak501
I've heard of historians using the Spanish-American War (1898) as the moment when the country was really united again. Enthusiasm and support for the war was at a fever pitch, and a lot of the volunteer units raised were from the southern states. Others have said World War I. That is in general, however. I'm sure the feelings go all of the way through to today. My grandfather met my grandmother in Oregon during World War II, and after the war it took awhile for the family here in Louisiana to fully accept her as she was considered an outsider yankee (this included people in the community as well). The centennial of 1961-65 saw a lot of symbolic reconciliation, but that was also subverted by the Civil Rights movement.
This post was edited on 11/11/18 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:22 pm to cheesesteak501
republicans couldn’t get elected in the south until the mid 1980s because of Lincoln being a republican
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:24 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:Arizona and Viet Cong too-
Yes. I’ve even heard stories of states incorporating the confederate flag into their state flag.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:25 pm to cheesesteak501
quote:
how long did it take to become a united nation again.
Truthfully? The Depression and WWII.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:27 pm to cheesesteak501
Yep. Sorest losers in American history.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:30 pm to VOR
quote:
It seems like the South resisted cultural, industrial and educational change during and after Reconstruction.
Certainly there is a lot of truth to that, but on the other side, Reconstruction itself was both corrupt and brutal. Between the carpetbaggers and the freedmen politicians, all Republican and a significant majority corrupt opportunists, the South was effectively "colonized" by the North for 15 to 20 years. The genteel thing to do in the South was to refer to the war as "the late unpleasantness" well into the 20th Century.
Of course, once Democrats retook control, politically, of the South, they oversaw Jim Crow and many regressive measures to counteract Reconstruction. Vestiges of this corruption and racism persist to this very day and was a significant factor in the schizophrenic nature of the Democrat Party in the 1960s.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:32 pm to cheesesteak501
I am sure there was.
However, it appears by all accounts those resentments were not harbored by most of the soldiers, many of whom got along well at memorial ceremonies later on.
However, it appears by all accounts those resentments were not harbored by most of the soldiers, many of whom got along well at memorial ceremonies later on.
Posted on 11/11/18 at 3:36 pm to udtiger
quote:
many of whom got along well at memorial ceremonies later on.
A popular anecdote about the 50th "Reunion" of the Battle of Gettysburg in 1913: The survivors organized themselves as best they could to re-enact Pickett's Charge - as the old Rebels gathered up (running from their late 60s to mid 80s) and did the Rebel Yell and started to charge, the Yanks poured down from Cemetary Ridge to embrace their former foes.
Imagine such graciousness and brotherly love today between the "warring" sides...
This post was edited on 11/11/18 at 3:36 pm
Back to top

25














